Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diddle E. Squat
Time to drop that accusation. DNA tests proved Danny Williams is NOT Jughead's kid(much to the stunned relief of Jughead)....

HUH!?

you're misinformed. pls. read the following excerpt:

Questionable DNA tests

Star magazine in what could have been the paternity suit of the century, decided to find out once and for all. The magazine paid Bobbie Ann Williams for blood samples of her son, Danny.The magazine is believed to have compared the results of the tests with the FBI analysis of the President's blood in the report by Kenneth Starr, the independent prosecutor.

To this day the FBI will not say that its lab report accurately portrays President Clinton's DNA profile, or whether that profile may have been altered in documents released to the House Judiciary Committee for reasons of national security or privacy.

If the President's DNA was camouflaged in anyway in the FBI documents, then the Star test may be unreliable. The only way an accurate test could be done is to get a verifiable sample of the President's blood and compare it to that of Danny Williams.

Christopher Curioli, an editor of scientific and medical textbooks said earlier this year that the Clinton DNA could have been changed for security reasons. Curioli has stated that an altered version of DNA information is commonplace, in the fields of genetic and virological research as a matter of industrial security. The fact that we are dealing with the President of the United States, may be more pressing.

Noted Connecticut criminologist Dr. Henry Lee told the New York Daily News that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) that the FBI used to match Clinton's DNA to the stain on Monica Lewinsky's dress would be inadequate to prove paternity in the Danny Williams case. "You can use the PCR test to exclude President Clinton or to say he could be (Danny's father)."

But Lee said positive proof that Clinton is Williams' father would require DNA test information not included in OIC documents released to the House.

More questions than answers

Five agencies have refused to endorse the accuracy of Clinton's published DNA profile. This further suggests that the President's DNA may have been altered for privacy and security reasons. With the Star magazine DNA tests taken from OIC documents and the fact that there may have been an altercation, the paternity test could prove to be worthless.

Until the truth behind Clinton's DNA is known, we will never be sure that Danny Williams is or isn't Clinton's love child. The public has a right to know and we will be waiting.

Published in the March 1, 1999 issue of Ether Zone Online! Copyright © 1999 Ether Zone Online (http://etherzone.com). Reposting permitted with this message intact.

105 posted on 05/02/2002 9:44:30 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: 1234
Thanks for posting the facts re: Danny and his probable papa!
256 posted on 05/03/2002 12:21:11 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson