[Gumlegs]

From Oztrich Boy: So. there are people out there who have devoted their lives to proving that; the House of Windsor are drug-running alien lizards; that Con-Ed is keeping Tesla's bounty from the public; that a tightly controlled conspiracy of several thousand individuals (including Jackie) killed JFK; and much else besides.

All idiots.

From handk: Come again? I couldn't quite make out what you're saying "Ostrich Boy" (oh, sorry, Oztrich Boy, or did you get the spelling wrong because you're dumbed down?). Head stuck in the sand? Pull your head out of the sand and maybe I can make out what you're saying.

As any lawyer would inform you, you're arguing the "left side" of the issue, and you're wholly "off-point."

JediGirl was objecting to the first handk paragraph. One can rationally disagree with Oztrich Boy's points, but I'm afraid handk's methods do not rise to the level of the rational.

I could be mistaken. Please tell me which part of that paragraph do you regard as something other than a "pathetic personal attack"?

Do you really believe adults persuade each other in handk's fashion?

[stainlessbanner]

This is not the only thread that this poster jumps in drops a turd on the discussion with the comment "pathetic personal attack" - that was my point.