I am amazed at how many here at FR can believe that the states can constitutionaly restrict gun rights, thus ignoring the clear words of the 2nd amendment. Can you explain these beliefs?
Now, you may disagree with this position, but it is a valid position with much legal precedent upon its side.
I, personally, support this ruling since I believe the US Constitution is a pact between the states and the federal government that limits the federal government and not the states. Just imagine how much mischief we would have avoid had the courts sided with this position in all aspects. The federal government would have been severly limited in meddling with matters within the states.