I don't agree with you about Hillary. She has always been a movement radical. And the only pure radical is a Marxist. I spent a long time studying the socialists. They were always in awe of Marxism. As for Bill, I don't think we will ever know the exact nature of his "study" at Oxford and Russia. When he went back to Europe years later he went to the home of a prominent Marxist. I agree with the old saying, "Measure them by their friendships."
In high school she was a republican movement radical. She selects whatever movement most convieniently serves her lust for power. She landed in radical liberalism because it doesn't require accountability, and is therefore most convienient.
Both Clintons utter the platitude that most immediatly furthers thier political agenda. That agenda has a single purpose; to promote the Clintons. Nothing else.
Thanks for your thoughts on my post.