We should make the assumption that a disrupter is one who is not interested in sharing information. The common disrupter does nothing but makes personal attacks or spends most of his/her time making personal attacks.
The common disruptor is rude, obnoxious, and twists the words of others. Distracting people from the debate and attempting to ruin the credibility of others gives him great joy and pleasure. The disruptor wants to control the forum until everyone either leaves in disgust or he/she gets what he/she wants.
And with that, it's time to enjoy this lovely day..
sw
We should make the assumption that a disrupter is one who is not interested in sharing information. The common disrupter does nothing but makes personal attacks or spends most of his/her time making personal attacks.
The common disruptor is rude, obnoxious, and twists the words of others. Distracting people from the debate and attempting to ruin the credibility of others gives him great joy and pleasure. The disruptor wants to control the forum until everyone either leaves in disgust or he/she gets what he/she wants.
Funny how, from where I sit, your little description looks exactly like how I see you.
The thing is, when you don't appear on these threads, we all get along fine. No one gets threads pulled. No info is lost. (Yes, I know you deny doing this, but I don't believe you.) Few if any flame wars. People intelligently express their views, and talk about the known facts. Then along comes Kim, with her Carnival of Distorted and Invented "Facts," complete with the Amazing Bleach Stories, the Astounding AWOL Charge, and the Ever Growing Number of Child Porn Images. (But wait! There's more! There's always more!)
The discussion then stops while everyone tries to correct her usual litany of misinformation. People leave the thread. It's like trying to talk while a circus is going through your living room. Which, in fact, it is.
And you call me a disruptor? You are the embodiment of disruption.