[Freedom2specul8]

I *think* I agree with ya! I was trying to say earlier, that if DW is the guy, or even if it's someone else, they found the weakness of hte parents and exploited it. Like I originally said, it doesn't matter if they were whores or Christian Ministers, the pedophile did not care. (if indeed she was a victim of a pedophile..) Which in a way overrides whatever their lifestyle is. That may not make sense. Now, if one does look at the lifestyle, that's a whole nother issue that can be criticized. It's just 2 issues.. One issue is the pedophile, his predatory behaviour and the second issue just happens to be the lifestyle of the parents. If the parents were Christian Ministers who spent say too much time away from home....would they have been critized? Just a thought..not a flame!

[Politicalmom]

If they hired babysitters who smoked pot, drank, and held orgies, then YES!!!

[Jaded]

You are ass-u-ming she was sexually assaulted based on the MEDIA and the misreports of porn. Wait for the evidence or would you rather just forgo the trial? Save a little money? If it's the wrong guy, well, so what, the papers said he was?

[RnMomof7]

Like I originally said, it doesn't matter if they were whores or Christian Ministers, the pedophile did not care

You are assuming it was a pedophile....it may "simply" have been a high friend of the parents..no inhibitions because of the ETOH and drugs. A deadly danger INVITED into the house BECAUSE of the parents "lifestyle" not their "faith" Kim!