Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Quite the contrary, I responded here that I don't think my answer undermines the Constitution at all.

You certainly “responded” – but you utterly failed to answer the question. Allow me to repost the question for your personal edification:

”Is the court supreme over the constitution, or the constitution supreme over the court?”

Now let’s review your ‘response:’

“I don't think my arguement undermines the Constituion at all.”

Were you ‘responding ‘ to little voices that only you can hear – or perhaps to a bad case of indigestion? Whatever the case, your post can in no way be described as a ‘response’ to the question at hand.

But feel free to continue your mental gymnastics – they are as humorous as always...

;>)

PS:

”Is the court supreme over the constitution, or the constitution supreme over the court?”

;>)

340 posted on 05/06/2002 4:10:52 PM PDT by Who is John Galt?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]


To: Who is John Galt?
So what purpose do you see in the Supreme Court? What role would you have it play?
347 posted on 05/06/2002 6:47:37 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson