That being said, however, there is not much left of the constitution to defend thanks to democraps and RINOs.
If however this person is not a US citizen then that is a horse of a different color.
Inalienable rights, which all humans have by their nature of being human, are rights that should be protected by the government, as its first foremost duty, these rights should be protected. The Constitution went out of its way to outline some of the finer points of inalienable rights and the government's repsonsibility. Although the Constitution was not an exhaustive discussion on all inalienable rights - just those the Founing Father thought that government would be most likely to abuse - thes rights exist wether they were discussed in the Constitution or not. The Constituion did NOT "grant" any rights whatsoever merely made a list of the important ones. Part of the "important stuff" is a judicial system that allows an individual a REAL self-defense. Everyone has the right to self-defense - not just US citizens. The Constitution when applicable to inalienable rights proects ALL HUMANS within our borders with respect to prsecution as a matter of principle to uphold the inalienable rights that every human has. American citizens are not a special group of humans subject more protection under the Constitution. Either EVERY human has inalienable rights, not just US Citizens, or no one does.
You've already established that you are a man of principle - think on these things . . .