Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marduk
"Chances are" doesn't count as evidence.

You can logically conclude that Halachally-jewish people will not consider themselves half-breeds. The Halachally-jewish people exlude the paternally jewish people - I know because I've experienced it.

By the way this whole thing is a non-issue, because in the days of the Patriachs, it didn't matter what the mother was. And the whole mother-determining jewishness rule was a rabbinical innovation of the middle ages.

For instance if there really was maternal transmission of jewishness solely, there would be a tribe named after Jacob's daughter Dinah.

41 posted on 04/30/2002 8:54:02 PM PDT by jonatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: jonatron
My guess is that this custom evoved as a consequence of rape and pillage by their "neighbors". The child of such a rape was raised as a Jew. Jews were generally forbidden to keep or bear arms for many centuries.
68 posted on 05/01/2002 12:01:44 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: jonatron
>By the way this whole thing is a non-issue, because in the days of the Patriachs, it didn't matter what the mother was. And the whole mother-determining jewishness rule was a rabbinical innovation of the middle ages.

>For instance if there really was maternal transmission of jewishness solely, there would be a tribe named after Jacob's daughter Dinah.

Excellent! I missed this earlier.

90 posted on 05/04/2002 7:22:15 PM PDT by skraeling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson