De Dawg bark, de ruffi'ns run away!
Check out this link, BTW
Cheers,
Richard F.
May I conclude that post to be your endorsement of Mad Dawg's fabrication, which itself is more egregious than the worst of what you allege against DiLorenzo?
He claimed I had intentionally left out something important from that Lincoln quote, you know. But when one goes to the full letter from which I quoted, sure enough - what Mad Dawg claimed was there isn't there. Nor is anything even remotely like it. He made it all up. And you just endorsed him for it.
I also noticed you linked to your article about the need to check the footnotes and sources. Do you ever take your own advice?
Funny. You whine about DiLorenzo then endorse a blatant fabrication. You whine about DiLorenzo checking his sources then forget to do so yourself before endorsing Mad Dawg's fabrication. Even more amazing, you do the latter right before you post a link to your own article touting the necessity of checking footnotes!
Looks like you've inadvertently beaten yourself at your own game, Richard.