Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REMEMBER ANTHRAX?
New York Post ^ | 4/29/02 | DAVID TELL

Posted on 04/29/2002 2:02:01 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:06:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Mitchell
So, the anthrax question is going mainstream. If the NYPost is asking these questions, can Fox News Channel be far behind? From there, the lag time to the major networks is, what, three months?

Leaving us to ask another question. Is the genie getting out of the bottle all by itself, if prematurely? Or is this merely Phase II of a "timed release" program, designed to reach a climax...when?

21 posted on 04/29/2002 5:30:02 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

22 posted on 04/29/2002 5:39:02 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan;piasa;knight hawk
Number 18 is what I also believe. One hypothesis is that the last gram-sized anthrax attacks were a warning shot, proving the high caliber of Iraqi anthrax production.

It was meant to be discovered and analyzed, but with several cutouts to avoid overt proof of origin.

If they can make grams, they can make tons, and they could have easily smuggled into the USA a hundred or a thousand kilo sized sealed glass jars of weapons grade anthrax spores.

A dozen Iraqi agents with ten jars each could shut down the 12 largest US cities for weeks or longer, and kill tens of thousands if all of the jars were smashed the same day on subway tracks etc. Shutting down the 12 largest US cities for a month would wreck our economy.

23 posted on 04/29/2002 8:36:59 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I have no doubt the old coot would use the stuff as #18 says.

If his he is as infatuated with his wacko revival of a lost ancient empire as he appears to be, and he has reason to believe we will end his dream once and for all, I couldn't think of any reason he would not use the stuff. It's not like he really cares about the little folks...

24 posted on 04/29/2002 8:54:04 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: okie01
So, the anthrax question is going mainstream. If the NYPost is asking these questions, can Fox News Channel be far behind? From there, the lag time to the major networks is, what, three months?

Leaving us to ask another question. Is the genie getting out of the bottle all by itself, if prematurely? Or is this merely Phase II of a "timed release" program, designed to reach a climax...when?

Has any mainstream article yet mentioned the likelihood, or even the possibility, that the anthrax mailings were an act of military deterrence, a warning to us to watch our step because our enemy has a weapon of mass destruction and is willing and able to use it? I don't think the mainstream media are close yet to revealing the truth.

25 posted on 04/29/2002 10:52:48 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Saddam indeed is capable to do such things, and his henchmen will carry out his insane orders. He showed that in the war with Iran.
26 posted on 04/30/2002 3:08:46 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell
"I don't think the mainstream media are close yet to revealing the truth."

No, they're not. But, as evidenced by this article, some are starting to get their minds around the concept that a.) the domestic terrorist theory doesn't hold water and b.) a foreign state may have been involved.

It will be very interesting to see how (and whether) the issue is developed from here.

Your earlier observation that the government may never confirm the anthrax attack was a "warning" seems plausible. Consequently, we can follow how the government attempts to "manage" the story as it develops. Will they try to smother and discredit the "foreign state terrorism" theory? Or will they try to guide it to a favorable timeline, scheduling a revelation concurrent with the attack on Iraq?

It is astounding, isn't it, how easily the media has been led by the nose on this story? Of course, they've been led in a direction they naturally wanted to go, making the job vastly easier.

Independent thought is not the media's metier.

27 posted on 04/30/2002 10:44:55 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Independent thought is not the media's metier.

LOL!

28 posted on 04/30/2002 11:00:18 AM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xdem
See also:

Hunting for America's Leading Anthrax Hoaxer: Dr. Strangelove Strikes Again -- in Scotland!

29 posted on 06/19/2002 7:18:13 PM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson