To: Angelique
We're supposed to castrate boys that have been homosexually raped? Rather than trying to fix them?
To: HiTech RedNeck
Don't even bother debating with these jerks. They, like liberals, care only for the issues and NOT about the people involved (be it the victims or the attackers).
To: HiTech RedNeck
She meant the chickenhawk boy rapists.
To: HiTech RedNeck
Non, we are supposed to do this to the guys who diddle children. What do not you understand?
To: HiTech RedNeck
When a bear of tiger takes to savoring people, they shoot it, though it breaks hearts. The effort to renorm offenders who were also victims is about as successful as teaching those bears and tigers to shun man-food. That's what makes sexual abuse of children so bad. It's sad; but the spoliated preditors must be , at the very least, socially castrated (jail) or , for really nausiatingly cruel crimes, capitally castrated (neck joint).
(Please , I speak figuratively: there are more humaine ways to kill predators than beheading.)
18 posted on
04/29/2002 1:22:24 AM PDT by
dasboot
To: HiTech RedNeck
Indeed, I believe that the erronious notion that the vicims an be "fixed" is , perhaps , one reason it is aprevalent and growing evil.
That, along with the erronious notion that many would be more content expressing the "full breadth" of their sexuality, will surely lead to more misery associated with the crime.
No sanction: no quarter.
19 posted on
04/29/2002 1:32:34 AM PDT by
dasboot
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson