Now, his successors no longer waste their time with debating the meanings of 'is'. They are into a lot more serious business, such as deconstructing the concept of 'citizenship'.
I would assume that your misguided comments are suggested that U.S.-born citizens are free to: absolutely and entirely maintain and nurture all allegiances and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which they or their ancestors or their enthnic brethren have heretofore been a subject or citizen;
More, since they are 'born' here, not naturalized, they do not need to support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; or bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; etc. etc.
Congratulations, Clinton disciple. You've learned your lesson well. Of course, you need not feel shame. Clinton's disciples know not the meaning of it.
In a prior post on this very thread you bristled when someone else painted you as possibly being "an Islamic Terrorist sympathizer/supporter". If you don't appreciate being mischaracterized, why do you insist on mischaracterizing the thoughts and words and actions of others?
On the contrary, I am a staunch defender of the Constitution. Your arguments, however, do not even have the appearance of being grounded in the Constitution. You seem to have misread it. You are trying to "prove" an indefensible smear - namely that American Jews are traitors. And so you should not be surprised when people challenge the smear with facts, or when people contradict your false arguments.