Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
Notice how you get 'no response' when an obvious fallacy is pointed out in ROL's position.

As I have pointed out in a private reply to Mr. Quackenbush, I have not forgotten him and will reply when I collect the necessary data.

Mr. Paine, I have asked you to quit these childish personal attacks on me. I will ask you one more time to cease. Your personal attacks on people (and I'm certainly not the only person you routinely attack) do not add to the debate. They do not do anything except disrupt this forum.

If you have something to add, some fact or some, reasonable, logical argument, then by all means, add it. Don't distort other people's arguments. Don't insult people. And don't play out childish vendettas against people.

134 posted on 05/03/2002 1:29:38 PM PDT by Rule of Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: Rule of Law
Notice how you get 'no response' when an obvious fallacy is pointed out in ROL's position.

As you & others here have made clear, the Declaration qualifies; -- "That to secure these Rights, - [inalienable rights, - to life, liberty, property] - Governments are instituted among men," -----. Seeing that only a republican form of constitutional government can 'secure' such rights, it is specious of ROL to claim that our declaration would allow states to secede to form ANY type of government that a states majority would will.

In reality, his position is clear. He disagrees with certain basic principles of both the declaration & the constitution/bill of rights.
He favors majority rule, - statism. - And refuses to admit this simple truth.  

As I have pointed out in a private reply to Mr. Quackenbush, I have not forgotten him and will reply when I collect the necessary data.

And? -- As I pointed out, -- you do not make public replies to certain posts.

Mr. Paine, I have asked you to quit these childish personal attacks on me. I will ask you one more time to cease.

Point out what you consider personal attack, in the above. You can't, You won't. There is none.

Your personal attacks on people (and I'm certainly not the only person you routinely attack) do not add to the debate. They do not do anything except disrupt this forum. If you have something to add, some fact or some, reasonable, logical argument, then by all means, add it. Don't distort other people's arguments. Don't insult people. And don't play out childish vendettas against people.

I made bold my logical argument to your view of the declaration. You seem to have ignored it, just as I pointed out initially.

You happen to think that observations on your political stance are personal abuse. - They are not. - Get over it, -- rebut if you will, quit whining if you can't, or choose not, - to reply. -- Its that simple.

142 posted on 05/03/2002 2:36:27 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson