The issue is not whether it did me harm; the issue is whether you posted the article in a straightforward manner.
what harm did it cause? That somebody clicked on the link and actually read the story? That upsets you? Why?
I have no clue what this string of insinuations is supposed to contribute except to muddy the waters. I have no objection to anyone reading the story. It is a very informative story. But I think it is important that FReepers have the confidence that when someone posts an article, they are really "reading the story," as it actually appeared in print, not as the poster has chosen to modify it to spin his particular point of view. I shouldn't have to click on the link to read the story; what you post should be the story , nothing more, nothing less.
I believe, in fact, that if you post copyright material, but change anything in it, you are legally obligated to say up front that you have done so.
Enough with you...if you feel you have a legit complaint, contact the moderator and get the thread killed. I'll post as I feel fit and 'within' FR regulations. If capitalization of '2' letters of a titles is a violations...let me be informed by the forum moderators...
Reuters Wire | April 26, 2002 11:07 PM ET | Dan Williams
Posted on 4/27/02 1:17 AM Eastern by infowars
The Washington Times | April 26, 2002 | Carter Dougherty
Posted on 4/26/02 5:59 PM Eastern by codebreaker
(AP) | AUDREY WOODS
Posted on 4/26/02 8:15 PM Eastern by Dallas