Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightOnline
Paleo-cons, however (again, NOT a friendly term....) are considered to be stuck in the 1940's or '50's and would rather spit in your eye than compromise on their beliefs.

Oh, you're talking about the .00005 percenters.

58 posted on 04/26/2002 3:17:47 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: AmericaUnited
"Oh, you're talking about the .00005 percenters."

No no........far from it. My "paleo-con" description was fairly accurate, if a bit tongue-in-cheek. Paleo-con's are staunch Constitutionalists. This represents a far, far greater percentage of Conservatives than what you choose to portray as some "fringe" group. If you choose to view, as the liberals do, the Constitution as a (what'd they call it?) "living, breathing document" that is to be selectively enforced or modified according to the whims of the day, then you and I are definitely on opposite sides of the fence.

In fact, I think you'll find the Constitution and its strict following to be the best gauge of where a "conservative" stands: neo- vs. paleo-. I'll stand with the paleo's on this any day.

66 posted on 04/26/2002 4:17:22 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson