[AlGone2001]

God being infinite and timeless is no respecter of time, in other words time does not limit God. So when he talks of time there is no prerequisite for him to follow our convention.

---

That's funny.  The big bang follows the convention of man. Why are you guilty of placing God in our convention?

He simply said, "Let there be light".  If God is God, why do feel the need to make Him fit into the pattern of the big bang "convention"?

He is God and if He says for something to exist, it just does.

Was He insufficient in that He needed to have the same light for three days (between period of darkness)?

And no, as I already pointed out, these were not stars, as they were created on the fourth day.

[medved]

The idea of a "big bang" is a bunch of BS, just like evolution. Having all the mass of the universe collapsed to a point would be the mother of all black holes; how in hell would anything ever "big bang" its way out of that?

Aside from that, the notion of an expanding universe, which the big bang idea is based on, is BS, based on nothing more than a discredited interpretaion of redshift data and what casuses it. Halton Arp has blown that away for all not in states of denial.

[AndrewC]

If God is God, why do feel the need to make Him fit into the pattern of the big bang "convention"?

I don't. The BB fits God's plan.