First, it's not a theory. It is a belief.
Second, no it doesn't.
I simply stated that the Big Bang was very possibly the mechanism by which Almighty God began the Creation...as in "Let there be light".
How do you suppose he did it?
The Big Bang may simply be the physical manifestation of what we see as the Creation as laid down in the opening verses of the Bile. Get it?
Oh, and then from there He used a more conventoinal method?
Where does the bible imply that there was any sort of "bang" from God's words?
Do you feel free to just imply it?
Was there also a bang after He made the grass, and after He made man?
There must have been. If you can imply one at the creation of light, one can only assume that there was more than one-that wold be one per event, right? Or is it only light that bangs? Personally, I've never heard light bang, do you have an example?
First of all, you refused to engage me on anything past the first day, so you have already disqualified yourself in that debate.
You want to use ONLY the opening verses, but refuse to take the journey through the remaining verses. I wonder why?
Secondly, the "big bang" theory implies a lack of order, but we see from the biblical account that the Maker was very methodical in His plan.
Get it?
Read your bible. It takes about 15-minutes to read the entire creation account.
I have already attempted to take you through the latter verses, but you basically said you were interested in no verse besides Gen 1:3.
The reason why is because the rest of the text does not support your argument.