The fact that Johnson himself stated the federal government did not have the power to enforce the 14th without denying the 10th means nothing to you then?
The fact that Johnson himself stated the federal government did not have the power to enforce the 14th without denying the 10th means nothing to you then? In what context did he state that? It might mean a lot, if you make some effort to explain. -- And, -- Johnson is hardly anyone most of us would choose as a constitutional authority, -- can you understand this position?