[theirjustdue]

"PS: I was replying to her about the brother-n-law "I don't recall you ever pointing out a quote from the brother-in-law to me about the AWOL charge "

To fully understand my reason for calling you on what I perceived as your feigning of ignorance about the bogus AWOL claim, we need to go back to your #643 to AMORE, where you again brought it up, having been told several times to contact San Diego LE if you still doubted it was in error. Your #643 to Amore follows:

"That's the same questions I had, when they erased the AWOL charges, the porn charges etc.. Granted the AWOL charge is a military matter, and only military can enforce their own rules and regulations..it's just all weird.

IMO, you are parsing in using the Brother-in-law excuse, because the real issue here is your seemingly disingenuous slipping of the bogus AWOL charge back into these threads, as if it were fact.

[Freedom2specul8]

IMO, you are parsing in using the Brother-in-law excuse, because the real issue here is your seemingly disingenuous slipping of the bogus AWOL charge back into these threads, as if it were fact.

I can see why you thought that..but to see charge after charge disappear from the sheriff's website until only one is left..I can't be anything but curious. I've decided to just wait until the end. I'll freepmail you the rest of my thoughts.

[MizSterious]

I think you're right. She tries to work in the AWOL issue every chance she gets, as she has also done with the "bleached" motor home, the 68,000 child porn images and other completely bogus stories that have been circulated, and later found to be untrue. Even after telling her (over and over and...etc.), it makes no difference. The truth is in the transcripts, which she hasn't bothered to read for the most part (apparently).