So, please accept my apologies for all the negative things I have said. They are not and should not be part of this thread, nor this forum.
What would be really helpful would be a thread where posters could establish FACTS. I know Kim and maybe Fresno had establish a QUESTION thread. It would be real nice to have an ANSWER thread.
Then again, what damn difference will it make? The DA's office and the Police are withholding information/evidence until the trial. Some of this is legally necessary to protect the rights of the accused.
It would also seem the mass media releases plenty of dis-information, but they do this on every news subject, always have and always will.
So let me ask some other questions. Maybe we can discuss these rationally.
If Westerfields's guilt was a SLAM DUNK, what would you expect to be done (as far as the quickness of trial, releasing info to the public)?
If there was evidence it might have been Damon, what should happen?
If the evidence against Damon was a SLAM DUNK, then what ? Just some thought provoking questions.
If there was evidence it might have been Damon, what should happen?
If the evidence against Damon was a SLAM DUNK, then what ? Just some thought provoking questions.