[FresnoDA]

See post #122 this thread, you seem to be functioning on about 3 of your 6 cylinders. 

Can not believe you are feigning ignorance of the discharge....but as Miz said, we are not going to read the transcripts for you. 

To bad, I thought you were a VD apologist, but at least a learned one...now it appears you are simply a headline browser. 

I thought you were more serious about this story kimbo....oh well, at the least, NOW WE KNOW the rest of your story....FresnoDA

[UCANSEE2]

FRESNOda

Time for you to take some of your own medicine.

According to the Transcripts there was evidence of a stain found on Danielle's underwear.
It was not determined to be semen, or vaginal discharge from abuse, or infection.
It was decribed as YELLOWISH STAIN. Yellowish as in urine.

DNA samples were taken of it and compared to some blood stain samples from a jacket and some carpet.

If it was SEMEN or signs from ABUSE, then Damon has a problem, cause the DNA matched DAMON VAN DAM, and BRENDA VAN DAM. None of it matched Daniel Westerfield at all.

Anyway, you have jammed Kimmy for not reading the transcripts, yet I find that you and others apparently either
(1) have not read them either, or
(3)Read what you wanted into it, or
(3)Skipped through them so fast you misunderstood the testimony and evidence.

[Freedom2specul8]

See post #122 this thread, you seem to be functioning on about 3 of your 6 cylinders.

Hey Punkeroonie...I'll save you some hassle. DON'T post to me...got it?