[Freedom2specul8]

Did the child put them in the drawer?

You mean she didn't keep dirty laundry in a close hamper? She never threw her dirty clothes on the floor so she could put her pj's on?

[FresnoDA]

Hi kimmie, it is early in the morning on the left coast, so I will use discreation. As many have stated, and Miz did so recently, it is Not Normal for a 7 year old to have heavy discharge unless something out of the ordinary (like regular sexual abuse) is occuring. That is the reason for the concern of many and the heavy questioning by the defense on this matter. Secretions, diary entries, all of these add up to a lot of 'splaining to do by The Demon, IMO.

[spectre]

You are really off on this one...Kimmie.

So what you are saying, is that she took off her dirty underwear and put them in her dresser drawer? Going with that, then Westerfield couldn't have his DNA on her underwear, now could he?

No, I think the discharge on her underwear happened before she was abducted. ...DW would have been too smart to stash the evidence in a drawer. A man who leaves no DNA or fingerprints in that house, wouldn't botch it by hiding underwear...no, no..

Then again, IF someone raped her and removed her underwear, {NO TIME TO ALLOW FOR A DISCHARGE STAIN} then they would have had to put her pajamas on her AGAIN...to take her out of the house. (Remember, we have to go with the Van Dams story about how Danielle was such a heavy sleeper, and possibly thought Damon was carrying her).

Do you think she slept thru a rape????

Tell us, Kim...how is this likely?

sw

[RnMomof7]

You mean she didn't keep dirty laundry in a close hamper? She never threw her dirty clothes on the floor so she could put her pj's on?

Well sometimes kids have favorite underwear ...wanted to wear it tomorrow? If it was not the kid..Dad has to move into the first spot as the lead suspect...How would Westerfield know where to put them in his rush??