Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nogbad
A country that has the technology and dedication to make weaponized anthrax of this quality also has the ability to produce a very effective delivery system.

That's the biggest problem I have with Iraq being the guilty party. Their Scud missiles were not very effective in the Gulf War (Iraq did very poorly in the Gulf War in general), and the Iraq-Iran war was essentially a stalemate. Has Iraq improved its military effectiveness that much? Or are we looking at somebody else, in fact? (Maybe Pakistani scientists have contributed significantly?)

87 posted on 04/25/2002 11:07:41 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Mitchell; The Great Satan
You don't need missiles
(much less crop-dusters)
to deliver anthrax efficiently.

This is the real possibility
for a suitcase bomb
not the nuclear one
that everyone talks about so much.

88 posted on 04/26/2002 1:48:12 AM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson