To: jwalsh07
the Supremes ruled that virtual child porn was protected by the first amendment You misunderstand the ruling. They ruled that the law was too vague, they did not make any sweeping ruling.
56 posted on
04/24/2002 6:10:22 PM PDT by
Dinsdale
To: Dinsdale
No Mr Dinsdale, you misunderstand the breadth and depth of the ruling. Read it again, they have made it quite clear that any of the states who have passed these laws will be overturned.
58 posted on
04/24/2002 6:16:00 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson