Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
the Supremes ruled that virtual child porn was protected by the first amendment

You misunderstand the ruling. They ruled that the law was too vague, they did not make any sweeping ruling.

56 posted on 04/24/2002 6:10:22 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Dinsdale
No Mr Dinsdale, you misunderstand the breadth and depth of the ruling. Read it again, they have made it quite clear that any of the states who have passed these laws will be overturned.
58 posted on 04/24/2002 6:16:00 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson