Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rule of Law
Senator Howard may have made such a statement, but the language that was to have made this happen was stricken from the Amendment before it passed.

Nope; the privileges and immunities clause is right there in the final amendment text.

162 posted on 04/25/2002 11:52:20 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
Nope; the privileges and immunities clause is right there in the final amendment text.

No one can say what "priveleges and immunities" means. There is no list.

Original drafts of the 14th Amendment had plain language indicating that the Bill of Rights applied to the states. This language was deleted. The fact that they deleted unequivocal language and replaced it with "priveleges and immunities" indicates that the phrase must mean something else.

166 posted on 04/25/2002 12:01:36 PM PDT by Rule of Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson