[ventana]

Wow, Thanks for the informative post, pal.

</sarcasm>

You obviously haven't read it!

You did not read hers! Do you think your studies from Denmark or the CDC trump her studies? They did not contradict them in any way. Nor would they be deemed more valid even if on point.

Further, it does not take a study to realize that the TRUE mortality rate from abortions is over 50%, just a conscience.

[jlogajan]

Do you think your studies from Denmark or the CDC trump her studies?

I have no idea where her study was validated by peer review. It sounds like an advocacy group (de Veber Institute) to me. Not data is given, just a conclusion.

I posted raw data and let the reader draw their own conclusion.

[cooperj]

the Danish study may be more statistically accurate due to their socialized healthcare national database.

but correlation is not causation.
we need the medical community to be honest with women about the risks involved, as well as the alternatives.
all the studies need to be examined to see if indeed there is a link. at least the deveber study provides a possible cause via the estrogen levels.
using bad science to to push an agenda is a trick of the enviromental whacko lobby, and should be avoided, even if the cause is just.

[Saundra Duffy]

Yeah. That post of pro abortion statistics. Pack of lies. The abortion industry's spin. I wonder how long it will take - if ever - until the truth will get out. It's frustrating to know that the American abortion industry will stop at nothing to keep women in the dark. Amazing.