[Phantom Lord]

No, I am not suggesting that. But my position is that it is not the business of the government what goes on between me and my wife (in my case) regarding sexual activity and practices. As long as it is not occuring in public view.

[weegee]

Why not invite the participants over to your home rather than holding it in a hotel?

And before you answer, consider that some neighborhoods have also kicked out tenents who had established webcam-sex houses. These places had no extra traffic to their residence because of the business they operated (just several women rooming together and occassionally having sex together for the webcam), but because they operated in the sex trade, their location could be restricted.

[billbears]

You and your wife, no. However, the problem is that true deviants use the laxation of certain laws to further their agenda. For example, sodomy while against the law is not enforced. However, what is enforced is the 'alienation of affection' law. Still in effect, and people still lose money and can go to jail for breaking up a marriage. I've heard several NC lawmakers' speeches against this law because if homosexuality is not enforced, why should punishment against breaking up a marriage be enforced?

Mind you the men who passed that law and the sodomy law were peers of, if not signers of the original Constitution. But here in 'enlightened' days, everything goes. To return to the Founder's ideals, which would be best? Enforce sodomy or break down the last vestiges condemning adultery and further destroying responsibilities found within marriage? I reckon at this rate, marriage will be obsolete within two to three decades. How long will it be from there, that NC recognizes same sex partners? Here in Apex, it'll be awhile but over in Chapel Hill, or even Asheville where it's rampant they'll be jumping for joy on that day