Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
Wow. No comment, just...wow. Just over a mile and a half, while under fire.
You mean at a mile and a half someone was firing back at him?
40 posted on 04/25/2002 1:25:31 PM PDT by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: patent
Mmmm. I may have conflated the two incidents described:

By daylight, after coming under enemy machine-gun fire, he managed to ease his rifle barrel between two rocks and quickly located an enemy sniper hiding behind a small piece of corrugated steel between two trees. He guessed the distance at 1,700 metres and fired one shot through the metal, killing the man instantly.

That certainly suggests that he was under fire for that one. In any case, if he were under fire for the second shot, it does not necessarily mean that it was an enemy infantryman firing back - it could have been another sniper, or perhaps mortar fire, or the like. Nevertheless, it's still a hell of a shot, regardless of the exact conditions. I know I certainly couldn't duplicate it - could you? :^)

41 posted on 04/25/2002 1:33:12 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson