There's a difference Reg, a big difference. Clinton directly ordered those criminal acts.
My point is that the headline indicated that Bush/Ashcroft directly promoted this guy, which they didn't. One more point, until such a time as this individual's actions pertaining to the Elian Gonzalez raid are found to be of an illegal nature by either the INS, or a civil court, there is no reason not to promote a 20+ year veteran of the service.
I don't like that, it's just the truth. Something that Larrybots need to acquaint themselves once in a while.