Posted on 04/22/2002 10:00:48 PM PDT by Kay Soze
If your going to make a statement like this, be sure to post the portion of my post you are referring to so we can make "some" sense of it.
But you have IMPLIED on a number of occasions that Klayman's depositions are filled with lies. You have stated that you don't believe Ron Brown was murdered ... which obviously means you don't think there is a bullet in his head or that any of the nefarious events alleged to have occurred at AFIP during and after Brown's body was examined did in fact occur. So again, I ask you ... do you know who Janowski is and what she alleged under oath? ... because your views seem to IMPLY that you think she is a liar.
PROVE IT, APLOGIZE, AND/OR GO AWAY.
It will only be through prayer, dedication, and utter vigilance, that all the Clinton crimes will one day be exposed to the American people. Remember, we always will have a chance to change history and the way it is written in the history books that our children will read in school. One day, Bill Clinton's only legacy will be his crimes and his only existance, the shutter of our remembrance.
Just like Howlin, your actions speak louder than your EXACT words, Amelia. Why are you afraid to answer a simple question about whether you believe Brown was murdered or not?
You have produced ample evidence that you are following me (and others) from thread to thread, carrying arguments from thread to thread in clear violation of forum rules, bringing up unrelated topics in each thread, and accusing me (and others) of saying things we've never said.
I'm not following anyone. You come to Klayman threads on your own accord. You can demand a IRS audit or question Klayman's finances all you want and I'll likely have nothing to say about that. But suggest that he never accomplished anything or that there is no political motivation in this audit and you are going to get challenged, like it or not. Appear friendly with Howlin and others who (YES INDEED) have demonstrably lied about their views about Brown's death or the facts in the Brown matter, and your credibility is going to be challenged. Why are you afraid to answer a simple question about whether you believe Brown was murdered or not?
You have also been calling other posters LIAR and other names.
And in each case I have backed up my accusation. You want to join VA Advogado in claiming Brown was autopsied? Yes or no? You want to explain how Howlin can believe Brown wasn't murdered yet not believe that Janowski is a liar? You want to explain how Howlin can say that Filegate was investigated and found to be about "nothing" yet not believe Tripp is a liar? You want to explain how out of the many audits that were instigated against opponents of Clinton, Klayman's is the only one with any merit? Why are you afraid to answer a simple question about whether you believe Brown was murdered or not?
BAC is, plain and simple, a damend liar.
My point is that there was no need for Klayman is ever cooperate with this audit, because it was politically motivated in the first place. Why should he give in to this bigotry? I would be upset if he did, because I know that he is a fighter and not willing to give the IRS an inch for their deceptive demagoguery.
But why did you say it in response to my list of items concerning Filegate ... the chief items being the depositions of Linda Tripp alleging that crimes occurred. How can you claim that Filegate was investigated and about "nothing" if you believe Tripp? You can't have it both ways, Howlin.
And how can you claim that Ron Brown was not murdered unless you are calling Janowski a liar? You do know who she is, don't you?
Now it has moved on to calling Amelia in favor of mass murder. It is the kind of people who defend Larry Klayman.
If that is the kind of people you like to associate with, fine and dandy. You belittle any credibility you have left.
And in case you're too dense to see, BAC doesn't NEED any antagonizing to drag out those tired and worn macros filled with lies, distortions and inneundos. It moves from thread to thread, trying to work its theory into any converstion. Why? Because that is its WHOLE LIFE.
I am NOT on trial here; it is NOT my duty to explain remarks I never made. DUH.
You obviously are the most obtuse person on the internet. You made statements that those depositions were FACT; I pointed out to you that they are NOT EVIDENCE until they are presented in a court setting and PROVEN under cross examination. I give you Bill Clinton -- AGAIN -- as an example.
You are a liar.
You are the one hanging out with demonstrable liars, Howlin.
You are the one who can't seem to get your FACTS straight where Ron Brown is concerned.
You are the one now parsing words like Clinton to escape the obvious conclusion that you don't believe Tripp or Janowski.
And, by the way, I'm a "he" ... not an "it" ... and what I've posted about Ron Brown is anything but "speculation".
Howlin: I believe every word she said; I have even sent her money.
Registered, now ask her how she can believe every word Tripp said yet claim Filegate was investigated and about "nothing". Both statements can't be true since Tripp herself said that Filegate wasn't properly investigated and was far from "nothing".
I don't get what all the fuss is about.
You see, the "fuss" is that Howlin is trapped. She maintains her "conservative" credentials by going after Bill and Hillary's looks and making snide remarks about Bill's "legacy", but when it comes to the crimes that those two committed, not only IMPLIES that we should move-on but says that they were investigated and found to be about nothing. My belief is that she is using her "conservative" cover to make sure that matters like the death of Brown and Foster never get properly investigated. Why else would she say that those who claim Brown and Foster were murdered give the GOP a bad name? Why else would she show more interest in getting Klayman than the fact that Riady didn't get the refund the Clinton administration and DNC claimed he did?
I am the one hanging out with people YOU say are proven liars, which is one of the best recommendations for friendship I have ever seen.
Sure whatever you say Howlin/
"If that is the kind of people you like to associate with, fine and dandy. You belittle any credibility you have left."
I have no problem with associating myself with either BeAChooser or ChaseR; these two are truly fine American patriots. Plus, you never considered me to have any credibility in the first place, so I guess that I have nothing to lose when it comes to you anyway.
"And in case you're too dense to see, BAC doesn't NEED any antagonizing to drag out those tired and worn macros filled with lies, distortions and inneundos. It moves from thread to thread, trying to work its theory into any converstion. Why? Because that is its WHOLE LIFE."
You antagonize BeAChooser just by referring to him as at "it."
"I am NOT on trial here; it is NOT my duty to explain remarks I never made. DUH."
No, you are not on trial, but you are posting on a public forum, which gives anyone the right to reply to your posts. And you are correct in saying that you don't have to respond to BeAChooser if you wish not to, but it would make you appear to be an honest debater at least.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.