Perhaps I shouldn't have interjected, because I was using the term "abuse" to conform with your opinion, whereas I hold that any sort of physician-assisted suicide is an abuse of life. That being clarified, your point was that there was no abuse in Holland, or that it couldn't be verified, and now that abuse has been cited, you claim that the offenders would be punished, when in fact the same sources that have been cited show that there has been no or very minor punishment leveled against those conducting the abuse.
The constitutional system works, if we let it. -- Big brother Ashcroft need not fret. - Or try bureaucratic, authoritarian methods to change it to suit HIS moral standards.
Perhaps I shouldn't have interjected, because I was using the term "abuse" to conform with your opinion, whereas I hold that any sort of physician-assisted suicide is an abuse of life.
Thats a fine moral holding, but I hope you agree that it cannot be a basis for constitutional law. Do you?
That being clarified, your point was that there was no abuse in Holland, or that it couldn't be verified, and now that abuse has been cited, you claim that the offenders would be punished, when in fact the same sources that have been cited show that there has been no or very minor punishment leveled against those conducting the abuse.
-- Yep. That seems to be the way the people in Holland want to run their own lives, or deaths..
Do you object legally to their right to do so, and what principle do you believe in that gives you that right?