Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
The FDA was formed to set interstate commerce standards for pure food & drugs.

-- Not to enforce federal laws regulating their uses. - Thus. -- There is no provision in the Constitution to allow the Federal Government to exercise authority over drug usage or medical procedures, --- is a true statement.

"traditional state's authority" according to Michael Greve, the John G. Searle Scholar and director of the Federalism Project at the American Enterprise Institute, "doesn't answer the federalism question — ever." Just because Congress didn't regulate an area in the past, "doesn't mean they couldn't ever do it. The real question," he says, "is does Congress have the authority, yes or no, under the Commerce Clause." It has long been clear that medical practice impacts interstate commerce and therefore may be regulated by the federal government (as the Controlled Substances Act already does in part)

143 posted on 04/22/2002 3:21:00 PM PDT by Fithal the Wise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Fithal the Wise
I reject the constitutional premise that you and your 'authority' are operating under.

Why do you WANT to give the feds these powers over doctors & drugs?

Its bad enough that we give our states far too much power over these types of personal decisions, imo.

Can you explain your position?

144 posted on 04/22/2002 3:52:42 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson