Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pets don't need shots every year
Houston Chronicle ^ | April 22, 2002, 12:32AM | LEIGH HOPPER, Houston Chronicle Medical Writer

Posted on 04/22/2002 6:20:53 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Experts say annual vaccines waste money, can be risky

Debra Grierson leaves the veterinarian's office clutching Maddie and Beignet, her Yorkshire terriers, and a credit card receipt for nearly $400.

That's the cost for the tiny dogs' annual exams, including heartworm checks, dental checks and a barrage of shots.

"They're just like our children," said the Houston homemaker. "We would do anything, whatever they needed."

What many pet owners don't know, researchers say, is that most yearly vaccines for dogs and cats are a waste of money -- and potentially deadly. Shots for the most important pet diseases last three to seven years, or longer, and annual shots put pets at greater risk of vaccine-related problems.

The Texas Department of Health is holding public hearings to consider changing the yearly rabies shot requirement to once every three years. Thirty-three other states already have adopted a triennial rabies schedule. Texas A&M University's and most other veterinary schools now teach that most shots should be given every three years.

"Veterinarians are charging customers $36 million a year for vaccinations that are not necessary," said Bob Rogers, a vet in Spring who adopted a reduced vaccine schedule. "Not only are these vaccines unnecessary, they're causing harm to pets."

Just as humans don't need a measles shot every year, neither do dogs or cats need annual injections for illnesses such as parvo, distemper or kennel cough. Even rabies shots are effective for at least three years.

The news has been slow to reach consumers, partly because few veterinarians outside academic settings are embracing the concept. Vaccine makers haven't done the studies needed to change vaccine labels. Vets, who charge $30 to $60 for yearly shots, are loath to defy vaccine label instructions and lose an important source of revenue. In addition, they worry their patients won't fare as well without yearly exams.

"I know some vets feel threatened because they think, `People won't come back to my office if I don't have the vaccine as a carrot,' " said Alice Wolf, a professor of small-animal medicine at Texas A&M and an advocate of reduced vaccinations. "A yearly exam is very important."

The movement to extend vaccine intervals is gaining ground because of growing evidence that vaccines themselves can trigger a fatal cancer in cats and a deadly blood disorder in dogs.

Rogers conducts public seminars on the subject with evangelical zeal but thus far has been unsuccessful in persuading the Texas Veterinary Medical Association to adopt a formal policy.

"I'm asking the Texas attorney general's office if this is theft by deception," said Rogers, whose Critter Fixer practice won an ethics award from the Better Business Bureau in 2000. "They just keep coming out with more vaccines that are unnecessary and don't work. Professors give seminars, and nobody comes and nobody changes."

When rabies shots became common for pets in the 1950s, no one questioned the value of annual vaccination. Distemper, which kills 50 percent of victims, could be warded off with a shot. Parvovirus, which kills swiftly and gruesomely by causing a toxic proliferation of bacteria in the digestive system, was vanquished with a vaccine. Over the years, more and more shots were added to the schedule, preventing costly and potentially deadly disease in furry family members.

Then animal doctors began noticing something ominous: rare instances of cancer in normal, healthy cats and an unusual immune reaction in dogs. The shots apparently caused feline fibrosarcoma, a grotesque tumor at the site of the shot, which is fatal if not discovered early and cut out completely. Dogs developed a vaccine-related disease in which the dog's body rejects its own blood.

"That really caused people to ask the question, `If we can cause that kind of harm with a vaccine ... are we vaccinating too much?' " said Ronald Schultz, a veterinary immunologist at the University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine. "As you get more and more (vaccines), the possibility that a vaccine is going to cause an adverse event increases quite a bit."

Less frequent vaccines could reduce that risk, Schultz reasoned. Having observed that humans got lifetime immunity from most of their childhood vaccines, Schultz applied the same logic to dogs. He vaccinated them for rabies, parvo, kennel cough and distemper and then exposed them to the disease-causing organisms after three, five and seven years. The animals remained healthy, validating his hunch.

He continued his experiment by measuring antibody levels in the dogs' blood nine and 15 years after vaccination. He found the levels sufficient to prevent disease.

Fredric Scott, professor emeritus at Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, obtained similar results comparing 15 vaccinated cats with 17 nonvaccinated cats. He found the cats' immunity lasted 7.5 years after vaccination. In 1998, the American Association of Feline Practitioners published guidelines based on Scott's work, recommending vaccines every three years.

"The feeling of the AAFP is, cats that receive the vaccines every three years are as protected from those infections as they would be if they were vaccinated every year," said James Richards, director of the Feline Health Center at Cornell. "I'm one of many people who believe the evidence is really compelling."

Texas A&M's Wolf said the three-year recommendation "is probably just as arbitrary as anything else," and nothing more than a "happy medium" between vaccine makers' recommendations and the findings by Schultz and Scott aimed at reducing vaccine-related problems.

But many vets are uncomfortable making a drastic change in practice without data from large-scale studies to back them up. There is no animal equivalent of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which monitors outbreaks of vaccine-preventable disease in people, thus keeping tabs on a vaccine's effectiveness.

Federal authorities require vaccine makers to show only that a vaccine is effective for a reasonable amount of time, usually one year. Richards notes that studies to get a feline vaccine licensed in the first place are typically quite small, involving 25 to 30 cats at most.

There is no federal requirement to show a vaccine's maximum duration of effectiveness. Arne Zislin, a veterinarian with Fort Dodge Animal Health, the largest animal vaccine maker in the world, said such studies would be expensive and possibly inhumane, requiring hundreds of animals, some of them kept in isolation for up to five years.

"I don't think anyone with consideration for animals would really want to go through that process," said Zislin, another vet who believes current data are insufficient to support an extended schedule.

Diane Wilkie, veterinarian at Rice Village Animal Hospital, said she tells pet owners that vaccines appear to last longer than a year, but her office hasn't officially changed its protocol yet. She said 20 percent to 30 percent of her cat patients are on the extended schedule.

"It's kind of a hard situation. The manufacturers still recommend a year, but they're the manufacturers," Wilkie said. "It's hard to change a whole professional mentality -- although I do think it will change."

In Houston, yearly pet examinations typically cost $50 to $135, with shots making up one-third to half of the expense. A dental check, heartworm test, fecal check and overall physical are usually included in the price. Without the shots, vets could expect to lose a chunk of that fee.

But an increasing number of vets are emphasizing other services, such as surgery. Wolf said savings on vaccines might prompt pet owners to get their pets' teeth cleaned instead. An in-house test to check antibody levels is in development.

"I definitely think there's a profit issue in there; don't get me wrong," Wilkie said. "(But) people are willing to spend money on their pets for diseases. Although vaccines are part of the profit, they aren't that big a part. We just did a $700 knee surgery."

Vaccination findings

Veterinary research challenges the notion that pets need to be vaccinated every 12 months. Some of the findings:

Dog vaccines/Minimum duration of immunity

· Canine rabies3 years

· Canine parainfluenza3 years

· Canine distemper (Onderstepoort strain)5 years

· Canine distemper (Rockborn strain)7 years

· Canine adenovirus (kennel cough)7 years

· Canine parvovirus7 years

Cat vaccines/Minimum duration of immunity

· Cat rabies3 years

· Feline panleukopenia virus6 years

· Feline herpesvirus5 or 6 years

· Feline calicivirus3 years

Recommendations for dogs

· Parvovirus, adenovirus, parainfluenza, distemper: Following initial puppy shots, provide booster one year later, and every three years thereafter.

· Rabies: At 16 weeks of age, thereafter as required by law.

· Bordatella: Use prior to boarding; may be repeated up to six times a year.

· Coronavirus: Not recommended in private homes. Prior to boarding, may be given to dogs 8 weeks or older, and repeated every six months.

· Lyme: Not recommended.

· Giardia: Not recommended.

Recommendations for cats

· Panleukopenia, herpesvirus (rhinotracheitis), calicivirus: Following initial kitten shots, provide booster one year later and every three years thereafter.

· Rabies: At 8 weeks of age, thereafter as required by law.

· Feline leukemia: Use only in high-risk cats. Best protection is two vaccines prior to 12 weeks of age, with boosters repeated annually.

· Bordatella: Use prior to boarding.

· Feline infectious peritonitis: Not recommended.

· Chlamydia: Not recommended.

· Ringworm: May be used during an outbreak in a home.

Sources: Ronald Schultz, University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine; Fredric Scott, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine; Colorado State University; University of California-Davis Center for Companion Animal Health.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
Our daughter's six year old schnauzer always had bad allergic reactions to the yearly shots. A year ago she almost lost this dog to an immune disorder. Those yearly shots are the suspected cause. Our daughter's love of this animal and the hard work of her and our vet pulled the dog through. However, this pet can never again get these shots. This will change where she can go and services providers who will care for her.
1 posted on 04/22/2002 6:20:53 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
We lost an 18 month old Bassett Hound to a rare liver cancer. This was after we signed up for all the shots including some new ones (flea prevention of all things).

I always suspected the vet's overuse of shots couldn't be handled by the dog.

2 posted on 04/22/2002 6:25:51 AM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
We lost an 18 month old Bassett Hound to a rare liver cancer.

I'm so sorry you lost your pet. I hope the word gets out on this. People who care enough to get their pets vaccinated, will continue to take them in for care.

Medicines have been beneficial but I'm beginning to think not only our pets, but we humans, are being over medicated.

3 posted on 04/22/2002 6:32:59 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I'm always looking for excuses to post my baby, Reagan!


4 posted on 04/22/2002 6:34:36 AM PDT by Lizzy W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I know that the rabies vaccine for my dog and two cats lasts longer than a year, however, here in Occupied Pennsylvania, yearly rabies shots are the law. Apparently, if your animal bites or scratches someone and their shots are not up to date (once a year), the animal is to be euthanized and the head sent to Harrisburg for testing. It's infuriating what I have to spend at the vet for routine shots. The producers of the vaccines don't want to change the law, and neither do the vets - too much money pouring in. How do we get this changed?
5 posted on 04/22/2002 6:34:38 AM PDT by Snowy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The vets we've encountered lately are still pushing the annual shots. They won't board your animal if it doesn't receive annual vaccinations or treat it if the treatment involves an overnight (or longer stay). I can understand the need for the shots, but not annually.
6 posted on 04/22/2002 6:35:07 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife, !DOG
Bump
7 posted on 04/22/2002 6:35:18 AM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
Rabies shots every year? Here in NC puppies get a 1 year shot, and then after that they get a 3 year shot. So, my four year old Boxer has had 2 rabies shots so far. Time for another 3 year is coming up. And my other boxer will get another 3 year shot in August.

And they might even be getting one that is longer than a 3 year shot.

8 posted on 04/22/2002 6:38:30 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I was turned down adoption of a kitten because my other cats were not current on their shots. Never mind that they were vaccinated and brought up to date 'if' they had to go to the vet. Never mind that they NEVER go outside.

Yes, the pet store called my vet to find out. One is 12, one is 8, and the other is 13. Wow, I must be a horrible pet owner.


This is Fidget.

9 posted on 04/22/2002 6:38:45 AM PDT by abner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I have to add...

What does "required by law" mean in the article when referring to the frequency of rabies shots??? Either the vaccine is effective for a length of time, or it isn't. How can where you live determine the effectiveness of a vaccine????? [/rant]

10 posted on 04/22/2002 6:38:55 AM PDT by Snowy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
I will say that we recently encountered a vet who was upfront about this and advised against annual vaccination. And in some cases, like the FeLV shot, recommended against it if you have a single cat who never goes outdoors (though keeping in mind that this could pose a problem if one ever needed to board the animal). That vet has been the only vet we've seen who's been open about the issue.

I can tell you what might change things, though I hate to say it: lawsuits. And frankly, if the veterinary profession doesn't get its act together, I'd say they'd deserve them.

11 posted on 04/22/2002 6:39:59 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
I know that the rabies vaccine for my dog and two cats lasts longer than a year, however, here in Occupied Pennsylvania, yearly rabies shots are the law..... How do we get this changed?

Print out this study and take it to your vet. E-mail it to your newpaper's medical and/or pet reporter and question the animal shelters and ask them what more you can do. I don't think they like putting down healthy but non compliant animals.

12 posted on 04/22/2002 6:40:36 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lizzy W
Oops, I forgot one.. .

That is Microcat on the left, and Fidget on the right showing Micro how big she is.

13 posted on 04/22/2002 6:42:00 AM PDT by abner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
They won't board your animal if it doesn't receive annual vaccinations or treat it if the treatment involves an overnight (or longer stay). I can understand the need for the shots, but not annually.

Most groomers won't take unvaccinated animals either. Maybe they need to be told you'll take you animal elsewhere. The money loss is the only thing that will get some people to listen to reason. If the animals are given shots and are not able to spread any disease, their owners should not be forced to give them something that could be fatal, or risk having their pet put down by the state.

14 posted on 04/22/2002 6:43:53 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Too many vaccinations, and this is what will happen to your beloved pet:


15 posted on 04/22/2002 6:44:16 AM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizzy W
Sweet.
16 posted on 04/22/2002 6:44:19 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Ask you vet about cancers caused by the oft repeated shots;
they are aware of the problem.
Here as well, if kitty ain't up to date (yearly) the city and the vet will find a way to force the issue.
If puppy is the wrong breed, puppy better damn well be out of public sight.
17 posted on 04/22/2002 6:46:46 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
What does "required by law" mean in the article when referring to the frequency of rabies shots???

If the animal is picked up and doesn't have current tags, I believe they are put down sooner than animals with up-to-date vaccine tags.

***Less frequent vaccines could reduce that risk, Schultz reasoned. Having observed that humans got lifetime immunity from most of their childhood vaccines, Schultz applied the same logic to dogs. He vaccinated them for rabies, parvo, kennel cough and distemper and then exposed them to the disease-causing organisms after three, five and seven years. The animals remained healthy, validating his hunch.

He continued his experiment by measuring antibody levels in the dogs' blood nine and 15 years after vaccination. He found the levels sufficient to prevent disease. Fredric Scott, professor emeritus at Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, obtained similar results comparing 15 vaccinated cats with 17 nonvaccinated cats. He found the cats' immunity lasted 7.5 years after vaccination. In 1998, the American Association of Feline Practitioners published guidelines based on Scott's work, recommending vaccines every three years.

"The feeling of the AAFP is, cats that receive the vaccines every three years are as protected from those infections as they would be if they were vaccinated every year," said James Richards, director of the Feline Health Center at Cornell. "I'm one of many people who believe the evidence is really compelling." ***

18 posted on 04/22/2002 6:48:49 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
WOW, I've been waiting to read this article for a decade or more.

Vets are a cash machine. My vet sells me special prescription food for my elderly doggie at 3 times the price of brand name quality off the shelf food.

As for lyme disease, I always thought that was a racket. 80% of dogs don't need it. The remaining 20% who are outside alot probably do.

19 posted on 04/22/2002 6:49:10 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abner
LOL, what cute kitties :)
20 posted on 04/22/2002 6:49:17 AM PDT by Lizzy W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson