Thanks, but no thanks. This whole thing began when you said four things off the top of your head that I asked you to support. Knowing that no data exist for two of them, I only asked you to support the other two. I'd rather not get back to information off the top of your head.
We know that holding sexual relations only within heterosexual monagomous marriage has worked for millennia. We can never prove that other sexual mores cause the failures of society, but we can prove that no society that has drifted away from that sexual approach has lasted long enough to give heterosexual monagomous marriage a real run for its money.
There is no reason to believe America's current sexual experiment will do anything other than fail.
Shalom.
I'm not too concerned with any homosexual experiments that may or may not be going on. I think that in a free society over time, reason will prevail, what's destructive will be identified and rejected while what's benign will be tolerated. I presume you're referring to Rome and Greek examples. They don’t apply because their constitutional separation of powers and protections of liberties were not as strong as ours, and they didn't have the technical means to objectively evaluate the results of any "experiments".
This whole conversation started from Msgr. Eugene Clark labeling the United States as "probably the most immoral country" in the Western hemisphere. I'm not going to tolerate that kind of projections of his own problems on us. I'm not going to pretend that homosexuality is a new phenomena and its nature is something that the evidence doesn’t support in order to be part of a crusade against it. His Church is about to be severely bleed by trial lawyers for its short sighted policies, not for the "extraordinary immorality" of the United States of America.
Shalom