One is left with the argument that only "celibate" Catholic priests are the class of sex-starved adult males who seek sex from male teenagers.The arguments you present and defeat are all straw-man arguments. The arguments that form a nexus between mandatory celibacy and ephebophilia in the diocesan priesthood are based on the former's having restricted the pool of otherwise qualified heterosexuals as well as having offered a respectable cover to the sexually confused and underdeveloped, thus contributing to -- not causing -- the hyperincidence of homosexuals and perverts within the diocesan system, which skewed demographic has in turn contributed both to the hyperincidence of sexual abuse of teenage boys and pederasty. Please note that these are not argument based on simple cause and effect but arguments based on having provided the right conditions for sexual immorality to flourish.
Moreover, absent the prerequisite of mandatory celibacy for the diocesan priesthood, sexual immorality in the diocesan priesthood would simply be a matter of individual responsibility and discipline; however, to the extent that the institutional church has made mandantory celibacy a prerequisite, which prerequisite has in turn contributed to the hyperincidence of sexual immorality in the diocesan priesthood, the sexual sins of a minority redound to the institutional church itself and undermine the authority and respect of the majority of diocesan priests who serve us so well in our parishes and schools.