Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

St. Pat Msgr. Hits Gays On Scandal / Blames woes on 'disorder,' U.S. immorality
New York Daily News ^ | 4/22/02 | NICOLE BODE and GREG GITTRICH

Posted on 04/22/2002 2:43:14 AM PDT by kattracks

Edward Cardinal Egan's stand-in at St. Patrick's Cathedral pointedly blamed the priest sex abuse scandal yesterday on homosexuality, a "sex-saturated" society and a constant assault on celibacy by liberals.

In a 15-minute homily from the most prominent Roman Catholic pulpit in the city, Msgr. Eugene Clark labeled the United States "probably the most immoral country" in the Western hemisphere. He also called homosexuality "a disorder" and said gay men shouldn't be allowed to become priests.

Clark, 76, a longtime key player and conservative voice in the Archdiocese of New York, delivered his stinging homily as Egan and other U.S. cardinals left for Rome to meet with the Pope about priestly pedophilia.

After preaching about forgiveness, Clark detailed reasons he believes some priests victimized children. He appeared to place most of the blame on homosexuality, saying the theory that people are born gay "is not true."

"The tendency to homosexuality is a disorder, not a sin," he said. "But the practice of homosexuality is truly sinful."

Some parishioners in the packed pews shifted uneasily, others nodded in agreement and a few walked out. But Clark continued, arguing that it was a "grave mistake" to allow gays in the priesthood. He blamed American society for being "very protective" of homosexuality.

"Homosexuality became in the American exchange of views a protected area," he said. "And unfortunately ... homosexual students were allowed to pass through seminaries. Grave mistake. Not because homosexuals in anyway tend to criminality, but because it is a disorder."

'The Most Immoral Country'

Clark also criticized what he called "the campaign of liberal America against celibacy."

He theorized that priests who have a tendency toward sexually abusing children — a group he pegged at 3% of the nation's clergy — were affected by a barrage of sinful images in society.

"Liberated sex is offered to people all day long, all evening long," he said. "There is nothing quite like it."

exct.gif (56219 bytes)

"We know — we won't mention it outside the cathedral — we are probably the most immoral country certainly in the Western hemisphere and maybe the larger circle because of the entertainment we suffer and what it's done to our [country's] morals ...," Clark said.

Christine Schubert of St. Paul dashed out of the cathedral midway through the homily. "I left because I realized I have no desire to be connected with the institution of the Catholic Church," said Schubert, 27. "I thought, wouldn't it be great if the entire church walked out?"

But few did. Most parishioners stayed, and many applauded Clark after his sermon.

Marianne Duddy, executive director of Dignity/USA, the nation's largest organization of gay Catholics, called Clark's comments linking the sex scandal with homosexuality "incredibly horrifying and irresponsible."

"This is a poor attempt to deflect attention away from the church's culpability for the sexual abuse of minors by priests and its attempt to cover it up for decades," she added.

But Catholic League President William Donohue praised Clark. "He makes a great deal of sense and to have this said so articulately by one of the brighter priests in the New York area is very encouraging," Donohue said.

"The internal problem in the church is a lack of governance and due to diligence," he added. "But there is no question about it — this is a societywide problem that goes way beyond the Catholic Church."

With Gretchen E. Weber




TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholicbashing; catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 401-406 next last
To: Aquinasfan
The only time I've seen people walk out of Mass was during a rare sermon regarding the disorder of homosexuality.

I walked out of a packed house the Sunday after 9/11 when the homilist started off referring to the sneak attack as a "tragedy" and wondering why such bad things happen, and similar mealy-mouthed BS. I couldn't sit there and listen to it. Later, I wrote a letter to the pastor about it, and his sermon the following Sunday was a patriotic course-correction. If we get off our asses and protest, vocally, they will respond.

281 posted on 04/22/2002 2:22:46 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy
Why do you say.. "you" as if I have this crusade to committ these horrible acts myself..

First of all I didn’t say “you” but we can pretend I did if you want. Second, you’re the one justifying how “it’s up to the people how they want to live,” so why don’t you support the same for incestuals and bestials, they’re morally and ethically the same as homosexuals?

I care not to even dignify you with an answer...

Yep, tough question unless you want to be a hypocrite.

282 posted on 04/22/2002 2:27:30 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hard to argue with the truth unless--YOUR A LIAR!
283 posted on 04/22/2002 2:28:37 PM PDT by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
To avoid these and try to throw all the focus on celibacy seems a tad obscurantist and dishonest, if not ideologically biased.
Please don't misunderstand my position. I think there's much to be said for there being an ensconced cadre of liberal perverts whose mischief has contributed to the present sorry state of affairs, and I am under no delusion that a further relaxation of celibacy is a panacea or isn't fraught with its own problems -- although nothing immediately comes to mind quite as insidious as sexually preying on our youth. I'm merely suggesting that the Church should consider the relaxation of mandatory celibacy for the diocesan priesthood as part of a multi-pronged campaign to set things straight (so to speak : )
284 posted on 04/22/2002 2:32:37 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Your right I just put in "you" to be simple.. you assumed in your question that I had no problem with it.. as if I personally thought it was ok to justify those actions... in other news... hey.. more power to the sheep herders if you know what I'm saying.
285 posted on 04/22/2002 2:36:34 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy
What I feel is life is when the fetus inside the womb is able to function outside of the body.
What does functioning outside the womb have to do with whether the fetus is alive? If it's not alive, it's inanimate. Are you arguing that the fetus is inanimate, even though it is developing, taking in nutrients and voiding waste products?
286 posted on 04/22/2002 2:37:31 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I better reply to incest before I get eaten up for that one... Are they of age? Meaning over 18? Bah let them go to hell if they want far as I'm concerned... no need to waste my tax dollars seeking out Cornfed brother and sister in the boonies.
287 posted on 04/22/2002 2:38:31 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Hmm let me try it another way... Let's consider life one's ability to communicate to the outside world(and yes babies communicate.. they scream don't they? they respond to getting food don't they? Alright then.
288 posted on 04/22/2002 2:40:13 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The man is heroic. I hope he sticks to his guns and isn't pushed into retracting his statements.
289 posted on 04/22/2002 2:41:49 PM PDT by Hamza01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
I didn't actually intend that sentence with the bit about "dishonest" and "obscurantist" to be understood as meaning your position, if that was the case. I was primarily meaning positions taken by liberals, dissenters, and some journalist. Apologies for any confusion. I'm aware of the valid discussions of celibacy as a church discipline, the history, theory, etc.
290 posted on 04/22/2002 2:42:59 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy
Taking in nutrients and voiding waste products is interracting with that which is "outside" (or "other than") the individual human fetus in the womb
291 posted on 04/22/2002 2:43:54 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Go get 'em Monsigor! About time somebody started telling it like it is instead of these watered down homilies. We need someone to make a whip of cords and start driving all the monsters out.
292 posted on 04/22/2002 2:44:57 PM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
Thanks for the clarification. I'm not particularly taken by the "liberals, dissenters, and some journalists" either.

Till tomorrow, friend.

293 posted on 04/22/2002 2:47:38 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
I can see where we can do this all day.. I'm not a scientist so I won't jump around with definitions... it is myopinion that life doesn't begin if the fetus cannot survive outside the womb during a abortion/birth.. then it isn't a complete functioning human being. And I will say "life" even though you clearly want to fight that word I'll use it anyways only way I can clearly communicate my opinion.. either way you can't argue my definition.. it's pretty concice.
294 posted on 04/22/2002 2:50:03 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
One could add to that that the church's teachings on sexuality face more complicated and difficult cultural and ideological circumstances in contemporary American society than perhaps they once did. Divorce, abortion, promiscuity, teen pregnancy, homosexuality, etc. have undergone transformations in the popular imagination. Things are accepted today which were more frowned upon in the past. (I know these have all existed in some form in the past, etc.). No romantic mysticism implied.

I think it is just valid to point out that about half of all marriages end in something less than bliss in today's sex-obsessed society. The idea that being able to marry ends the sexual psychodrama for most men and women (or for clergy)just doesn't square with the facts. And I think this is one proplem with the hydraulic plumbing theory approach to sex. It's not just about the release of a build up of tension (which seems to be the idea some of the critics of celibacy argue). I know of no adult male that I know socially or personally who goes looking at male teens for that.

295 posted on 04/22/2002 2:50:55 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy
hey.. more power to the sheep herders if you know what I'm saying.

Yep, you are just another immoral relativist Liberaltarian I presume.

Are they of age? Meaning over 18?

Of course and in a loving, monogamous, consensual, long term relationship.

But something tells me you’d go for the marriage too, wouldn’t you?

296 posted on 04/22/2002 2:52:21 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Feenian
Msg. Clark was the head of St. Agnes Church in midtown NYC for many, many years (I believe Father Sheen's old parish). He is a fine old priest, very much in the movie tradition of Spencer Tracy & Pat O'Brien. St. Agnes is a wonderfully old-fashioned Catholic Church which serves endless amounts of commuters from Grand Central Station.
297 posted on 04/22/2002 2:53:44 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Faggots are a great reason to cut funding for AIDS research. Let natural selection work!
298 posted on 04/22/2002 2:54:06 PM PDT by Exnihilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy
I am calling you anti-American because you are advocating mob rule. This is a constituional democratic republic. We are not ruled by mobs, just as we are not ruled by a simple majority. But I really think your thinking is too muddled to profit from an explanation, and I'm signing off now.

Add history to that list of course I recommended.

299 posted on 04/22/2002 2:58:11 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Go Msgr. Clark! Way to tell the truth.
300 posted on 04/22/2002 3:03:25 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 401-406 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson