Skip to comments.
St. Pat Msgr. Hits Gays On Scandal / Blames woes on 'disorder,' U.S. immorality
New York Daily News ^
| 4/22/02
| NICOLE BODE and GREG GITTRICH
Posted on 04/22/2002 2:43:14 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 401-406 next last
To: steve-b
The fact that it took 70 posts before somebody called this Clintonesque blame-dodging what it is says something about FR, and it ain't something good.The fact that the liberwhackians believe America can swim in a sewer and not get soiled simply beggars the imagination.
But no one sensible ever accused liberwhackians of being possessed of common sense.
To: all
This is not just a Catholic problem.
The predator/agenda advancing Homosexuals have invaded most of our churches.
They do not believe in God, the birth of Christ and the resurrection.
Their religion is advancing the agenda of the Homosexuals! They are not Christians and hate Christians. They use the church to advance their homosexual agendas and to be a predator.
If you belong to a church or parish where the lay members have a choice re your selection of your ministers and priests, ask a simple question during the interview process of the selection of a new minister or priest.
"Do you believe in God, in the Birth of Christ and the resurection of Christ?"
Watch how they answer this question. You will be amazed at how many will admit right up front that they dont'. If they say yes, have them sign a pledge that if you find out later they lied about thess critical foundations, they will be terminated for cause with no parachute package. If they don't sign the pledge, they are out of consideration.
Last but not least run a thorough police and back ground check on any individual hired for any job in a church!
To: Feenian
He is soft-spoken and pretty tentative, believe it or not. Generally very diplomaticThat is my impression too, from watching him on EWTN.
So I am surprised he would make such a strong statement: but I thank him for it!
103
posted on
04/22/2002 7:25:28 AM PDT
by
gumbo
To: Alas
I am not addressing the question of the necessity of baptism but the fact that you were. And I am saying that you owe your faith in Jesus to those who baptized you . Without that faith, the Bible is just another book.
104
posted on
04/22/2002 7:26:58 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: kattracks
Look for the gay community to now start their campaign against the Catholic Church, much in the same way as they have assulted the Boy Scouts. It's a sad day in our country when a immoral, perverted group can flame the fires of hatred against what is good and true. God bless this man who had the courage and conviction to speak the truth.
105
posted on
04/22/2002 7:29:32 AM PDT
by
Lucky2
To: uncbob
I believe it was on 60 Minutes II last night where they interviewed a man who was sexually abused by a priest at age 14, and he said it continued for six years! And that was only because the priest was transferred.
Now, to compare the effect of that "abuse" to the effect of rape does a grave injustice to rape victims. I doubt they would allow themselves to be raped for six years.
To: kattracks
Well, it seems that there is at least
one person in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church willing to point out the elephant in the living room.
This scandal has always been a problem with homosexuality, and homosexuals running the seminaries, and fellow homosexuals protecting each other when they are caught.
Thank you, Msgr.
To: Kevin Curry
Speak the truth and you may be expected to be abused, insulted, condemned, and ridiculed According to Kevie, the "truth" is that the scandal is the fault of everything and everyone except the pederasts and the apparatchiks who covered up for them.
108
posted on
04/22/2002 7:31:06 AM PDT
by
steve-b
To: kattracks
what a pathetic denialist. own up to your churchs problem, msgr. YOU and YOUR church recruited these animals, then turned a blind eye to the victims when you were aware of child rape, and neither removed the pigs from the church or allowed the victims to speak out. and now you want to blame everyone else. i'm glad i have no membership in your sham of an endeavor. Christ died for all, but never for those who would not repent or act with contrition. blame everyone else, but not those most responsible. WHHOOOO...THE CHURCH OF CLINTON!!!!!
109
posted on
04/22/2002 7:31:12 AM PDT
by
galt-jw
To: SkyPilot
That is the issue..and it is good someone has said it out loud..Maybe now with a little light, the church can do screening at the seminary level and in a few years the issue will resolve itself..
I can not help wondering how the "leadership" will react to that much truth being said out loud by one that knows
To: Grampa Dave
They do not believe in God, the birth of Christ and the resurrection. You are talking about the activists. Many ordinary homosexuals are believers--of some sort--. I read that in a (1980) survey of the homosexual in the San Francisco area that 60% of homosexual men professed to believe. Only 25% of the lebians did however. In any case, this is far below the 85% of the general population who are believers.
111
posted on
04/22/2002 7:31:24 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: Kevin Curry
I don't understand why you've chosen this thread to go on one of your anti-libertarian tirades. Is steve-b a libertarian? Or is he just anti-Catholic? I'm a libertarian, and a Catholic, and agree wholeheartedly with what the Monsignor said. Just because I don't want to outlaw something doesn't mean I'm in favor of it. In fact, I think that the tendency over the past century to substitute the state as chief moral authority, in the place of God and His Church is what has led us to the current morass of immorality.
Comment #113 Removed by Moderator
To: AmericanInTokyo
Those disaffected can go off and form their own decrepit, permissive Gay Catholic Church where they can get in touch with their secular humanist inner selves till the cows come home without polluting the great congregation of those who have just about had enough of this darkness and scandal. Good point, but they don't want their own institution. They realize it would be just a mockery, a heretic visage, a joke.
They want to rot the real church from within, dress up in its legitmacy, and change it to suit their own selfish, evil whims.
To: kattracks
If the Pope and the hierarchy trumpet Msgr. Clark's words from the mountaintops, loudly and firmly, it will be the best thing the church could do for itself.
Be prepared for "Act-up" and other Catholic-haters to throw condoms --and worse-- in the sanctuary of St. Patrick's again. But the Church must not back down in standing for the truth.
115
posted on
04/22/2002 7:34:56 AM PDT
by
gumbo
To: Alas
I realize you have not specifically directed any comments to me. But would you do me a favor?
Please do not try to turn this thread into a discussion about how Catholics will only be 'SAVED' when they turn their backs on their Church and embrace your own viewpoint!
This thread is about a Priest who has told the truth rom the pulpet! Can we please try to focus on the subject?
If you want to discuss what you want to discuss...start your own thread! Thank you!
To: Renatus
Wonder if you would be so kind as to comment on the Msgr's point that one of the big problems is the "constant attack on celibacy by liberals." It doesn't make sense and it shifts blame away from those who are truly responsible for the current crisis. If these pederasts had been kicked out of the priesthood when these incidents were first discovered (as they were in some dioceses) we wouldn't be staring down the barrel of RICO lawsuits.
Clarke also makes celibacy look like a fragile little flower which can't even be subjected to examination without all kinds of dire and unconnected consequences. That's just foolish.
Comment #118 Removed by Moderator
To: SkyPilot
Good point, but they don't want their own institution. They realize it would be just a mockery, a heretic visage, a joke.
That's why they try and force their way into the BSA etc. They realize if they tried to start their own organizations they would flop.
This should be STRESSED. They are free to start their own BSA or churches and advertise homosexuals welcome with open arms. This is a free country.
BUT NO
They have to try and infiltrate existing organizations
119
posted on
04/22/2002 7:39:59 AM PDT
by
uncbob
Comment #120 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 401-406 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson