[TheHound]

It just toasts me that people find some kind of satisfaction out of trying to explain the motivations of long dead famous people, especially so, when it is one of the poeple I most respect. We can't even agree on what he wrote or what he stole, but we now feel confident in espousing his sexual orientation. His ability to describe the universal human condition defies anyones attempt to define him; because you must use his own writings which were made to describe to you your condition, to describe him. Good luck.

[aristeides]

I thought I was saying his sexual orientation doesn't particularly matter. Where do we disagree?

[weegee]

So some overpaid "scholars" are spending all their research time investigating William Shakespeare's sex life?

When we had investigators doing this of the top public official, we were told that "it's just sex". "it's his private life", etc.

I'd be real interested in hearing this scholar's take on Ken Starr...