To: medved
This is totally fascinating and has some good points about the electrostatic mind. It certainly is original. So basically you would say that all languages are fairly new say 4-6,000 years old?
11 posted on
04/21/2002 7:25:31 PM PDT by
gore3000
To: gore3000
Possibly more like 3500 years old. Again, my money is on Heinsohn and Sweeney in the questions of chronology.
Spoken languages of the kind we now use are no older than that in my view. Prior to the flood, communication would have been telepathic, although a person using that system could easily have had many of the same kinds of experiences we do.
The human brain is good at rerouting data paths; for instance, blind people "reading" braile with their fingers apparently use many of the same brain areas which sighted people use for vision. A similar rerouting appears to have taken place in going from the antediluvian system to our present system of spoken speech.
12 posted on
04/21/2002 7:32:53 PM PDT by
medved
To: gore3000
BTW, I assume you can see what a kicker this one would be for an evolutionist to try to explain?
13 posted on
04/21/2002 7:34:18 PM PDT by
medved
To: gavriloprincip
Does the theory of evolution apply to language? Is there any information explaning how a language develops or the length of time it takes to even be called a language?
Interesting -- but I don't know that much about language development.
14 posted on
04/21/2002 8:05:46 PM PDT by
cebadams
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson