I wouldn't waste my precious time getting into telephone fisticuffs with you on your excursion into vanity radio. You have shown an extraordianry inability to engage in rational debate. Your use of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo against TomB as proof of the falsity of his thesis was laughable, in that said treaty was imposed by the sword by the armies of General Winfield Scott.
Tom raises a rather valuable point. As a tinfoiler, you have rightfully been suspicious of the United Nations in the past. Now, you change your tune. Hmmm, why now? Why do you trust the United Nations all of a sudden? Could it be that they're going to be about the business of sandbagging the Israelis? Perish the thought!
Finally, your response to my rather long deconstruction of your post and your "cut and paste" action leaves something to be desired. A lot, actually.
Look, debating you is a bit like taking candy from the baby, so give it up. You can't win, you know. You're on the wrong side of the issue. You're giving an apologia for terrorist gangsters, not a reasoned defense of Palestinian nationalism. Your deafening silence during the PA's terror campaign, when set against the volume of your posts during the Israeli invasion, is an indictment in and of itself.
Your responses, separated from your copies of articles from AFP, The Independent, and The Guardian, can best be summarized in a passage from Shakespeare: "...sound and fury, signifying nothing."
Or, to put it another way: Jethro Tull, you are no Maureen Dowd.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Apparently not.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!!!