Who are therefore NOT Christians.
Quod Erat Demonstrandum.
And no-one accused you of libeling Christians.
At least, not yet.
But here you are in your own hand, writing that these people whom you say you have judged to be not Christians at all are in fact Christians but that they are only to be Christians for the purpose of making your argument that these Christians who are not Christians at all murdered Jewish People after which presumably they will again resort, according to your judgement, to being Christians only in name -- that is to not actually being Christians at all?
Now, there is no doubt that the athiestic, lunatic left-wing fringe-dwelling Fallaci's libel was and is an obscenity. She writes with crystal clarity and her failed Catholicism will out!
Fallaci's is a foul example of the Goebbelsian Big Lie.
But who could possibly accuse you of such a libel?
Or of anything at all?
Why, he would need the combined skills of a Karl Yung AND a Sigmund FReud just to figger out what on Earth you were trying to say!
Cordially
Brian