Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
That they occurred accidentally is largely irrelevant, as they HAPPENED on an OKC scale.

Wrong. A shipload of amonium nitrate is a far cry from a ryder truckload. As I stated above, name one time a ANFO bomb was contructed to blow up a buiding before OKC.

68 posted on 04/19/2002 1:30:56 PM PDT by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: quimby
name one time a ANFO bomb was contructed to blow up a buiding before OKC.

Didn't they use ANFO and a Ryder van in 1993 to attempt to blow up the WTC? I recall seeing pictures showing that it was parked next to a reinforced wall which reflected the explosion outward. It also removed at least two floors from the parking garage but left the support beams basically intact.

90 posted on 04/19/2002 4:26:27 PM PDT by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: quimby
A shipload of amonium nitrate is a far cry from a ryder truckload.

Not really. The ship was some distance from what was destroyed (as someone pointed out earlier, blast effects are substantially reduced by distance). The truck was just a few feet away. Proportionally, it works out about the same.

100 posted on 04/19/2002 5:18:09 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: quimby
As I stated above, name one time a ANFO bomb was contructed to blow up a buiding before OKC.

As I stated above, there are numerous comparable instances with comparable results. The only difference was accident vs. intent, which has absolutely no bearing on physics.

101 posted on 04/19/2002 5:20:01 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson