Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HOT! "Deathbed" Confession Transcript -- World Exclusive Iraqi intelligence tied to Terry Nichols
Insight Mag ^ | 04.19.02 | Timmerman

Posted on 04/19/2002 8:35:39 AM PDT by Registered

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-200 next last
To: quimby
As I stated above, name one time a ANFO bomb was contructed to blow up a buiding before OKC.

As I stated above, there are numerous comparable instances with comparable results. The only difference was accident vs. intent, which has absolutely no bearing on physics.

101 posted on 04/19/2002 5:20:01 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Don Carlos
There is surveilance camera footage of the "across the street" damage, showing the wall being blown in. That was no small blast.
102 posted on 04/19/2002 5:21:38 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: yikes
I _could_ buy into a third-party connection. There may be good evidence to that effect. Problem is, there are so many gasbags blathering away about the subject who plainly don't understand basic chemistry, physics, psychology, or real life...let alone the facts at hand. Separating the very little wheat from the voluminous chaff just isn't worth my time.
103 posted on 04/19/2002 5:23:58 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

Comment #104 Removed by Moderator

To: 4ourprogeny
Neither Nichols nor McVeigh had the money, info or brain to bring about the OKC bombing.

Oh come now! It's not that hard nor expensive. If either one was particularly plugged into a "militia" group, the info would almost fall in his lap. Buy ingredients for a few hundred bucks, mix in containers, place in truck, drive to target, ignite improvised fuse, leave quickly, big boom.

My whole point is: it's not that hard. I don't understand why so many people don't get it...

105 posted on 04/19/2002 6:01:24 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Justa
Excuse me!!!

I see the word "test" so I will assume that it was not directed at me. If so please explain.

If your reason is that I did not define who "they" was, it is because at the moment I could not recollect the names of the Middle Easterners convicted of planting the bomb in the garage beneath the WTC. It was not a reference to those involved in OKC. I am fully aware that Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were never alleged to be involved in that attack in 1993 nor do I have the remotest reason to believe that to be the case.

106 posted on 04/19/2002 6:31:40 PM PDT by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
"So Many People Don't 'Get It'" because the PHYSICS DOESN'T CORROBORATE the INCIDENT!!

YOU, (Sir, Ma'am) are either OBFUSCATING the FACTS, or are WOEFULLY IGNORANT of the physics of the "Murrah Building Event!"

NO WAY an "ANFO BOMB" Dropped the Murrah Building BY ITSELF!!!

There is PLENTY of testimony by explosives experts (USAF GENERALS) who corroborate my POV!!

If we EVER learn "The Truth," I, for one, would be curious WHO YOU ARE!!

I only hope we can "Hold our Civilization Together"--despite "Those who manipulate us like 'ctdonath2!!'"

Doc

107 posted on 04/19/2002 6:45:25 PM PDT by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: berned
Have been to "ground zero" only once since April 95, although I used to attend mass at St. Josephs Old Cathedral frequently. In fact my daughter was married there. St Josephs is directly west of where the Murrah bldg stood.

I'm quite willing to hazard guesses as to distance from where the truck-bomb parked to other buildings. Please bear in mind however that (1) these are just that, guesses, and (2) I have studiously avoided and will continue to avoid all the conspiracy B.S. like the plague!

Murrah Bldg north side was on 5th street. Thats where the truck parked. The west street border would be Harvey, the east Robinson, and the south, 4th street. OK? So, figure about 400 ft between Robinson & Harvey, and perhaps 300 between 4th and 5th. St Josephs was on 4th and Harvey facing south, perhaps 300 feet from its front door to where the truck parked. One block east was another church, on the corner of 4th and Robinson, also facing south and about the same distance from where the truck parked. Both these churches were partially sheilded by the M.B.

The north side of 5th street, across from M.B. was parking, then the Journal Record building, about two hundred feet away.

The northwest corner 5th & Harvey was where the Water Resource group met, dont remember the building name, and immediately east was the Athanai building, a small office building with a Greek restaurant on ground floor. These would be maybe 250 feet on the diagonal going NW from the M.B front door.

Forgot to mention earlier, but on the NW side, 5th & Robinson was the YMCA building, again perhaps 250-300 feet from where truck parked.

Both churches were heavily damaged but repaired. The Water recources bldg and the Athenai had to be razed, as was the YMCA. The J.R building was heavily damaged. The west side of that building is now the bombing memorial museum. I believe the remainder of the J.R. building has been repaired, but cant swear to it.

FYI, I work approx. 1.5 miles NE of the blast site, and the blast rattled windows there to the point people headed for the doors. My first impression was an aircraft going into dirt nose first, and very close by. Within a couple mins it was obvious from the debris cloud that it was a downtown blast of some sort.

As to your question concerning gas mains, yeah it seems like good luck that there wasn't one running underground right there. There was plenty of chaos as it was, which I'm sure contributed greatly to some of the theories.

Regards

108 posted on 04/19/2002 6:48:53 PM PDT by Don Carlos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay
You're frothing at the mouth as you rabidly try to avoid the obvious. Such a hysterical post shows you are not to be reasoned with, particularly when you start accusing me of being part of The Conspiracy (heh! giggle! that's a good one!). Get a grip, dude.

Apparently the only way you'll be convinced is for someone to actually buy a Murrah-type building, mix up some ANFO, buy a truck (let's avoid a rental one, ok?), detonate it in the same location, and look really surprised when a large bomb actually does major structural damage to a medium-sized building (go figure!).

Somewhere between unquestionable precident of blowing up stumps with cupfuls of ANFO, and flattening part of a small city with a boatload of the stuff, is seriously damaging a medium-sized building with a truckload of the same material. The proportions are obvious to me...why don't you see the obvious?

If you want to convince me of your sanity, please explain how much truck-delivered ANFO would be required to produce the same architectural effects from the same location? If about 4000 pounds of the stuff parked right at the sidewalk isn't enough, what is?

109 posted on 04/19/2002 7:43:26 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Well, my Friend, "Life would be Simpler" if your Premise (The "Lone, Right-Wing-Psyco-Anti-Government-Militia-Nut") somehow described the Murrah Building Collapse!

I, & MANY of my Concerned Associates, WANT the events of the past six months to have been an "Aberration!"

DESPITE YOUR BEST OBFUSCATION, the MOST COMPETENT EXPLOSIVES EXPERTS on the Planet regard the Murrah Building Implosion to be an "Inside Job!!"

Sorry, my FReeper Friend, the "ANFO BOMB" could NOT have "Brought Down" the Murrah Building!!

AS USUAL, "Things are NOT as THEY Appear!"

------& SO IT GOES!!----!

Doc

110 posted on 04/19/2002 8:18:00 PM PDT by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

Comment #111 Removed by Moderator

To: ctdonath2
One hopes that you will...ah....evolve.
112 posted on 04/20/2002 6:32:28 AM PDT by yikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay
Prove it. Put a picture of the crater on this thread that shows ALL of the exposed sides of the crater so we can measure it.
113 posted on 04/20/2002 6:48:52 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: L_Von_Mises
"I am fully aware that Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were never alleged to be involved in that attack in 1993 nor do I have the remotest reason to believe that to be the case."

What 1993 attack are you talking about, Waco? Boy, if the OKC epic has morphed that way I would take it as an indication the discussion was being sponsored by the American Pharmaceutical Association.

Imo the only people putting out information of Arab involvement in OKC are low-level government agents. That some people have sustained their OKC illusions 7 years and are finally seeing media attention is good. I'm happy for them. It means they're able to reduce their dosages. Perhaps for once they will have both reason and lucidity in their review of OKC and see the building wasn't a steel-reinforced concrete bunker. As it is I give all posters a big, fat F when I see they haven't even considered the building's architecture before determining the dynamics of it's destruction.

114 posted on 04/20/2002 8:45:56 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay
Yer funny. In response to a very specific question, to wit how much ANFO would have been required to do that job, you return to more insults and LOTS more CAPITALIZATION which I suppose MAKES YOU SOUND VERY SERIOUS even though you present no PROOF beyond a CONDESCENDING ATTITUDE. GOLLY GEE, IF YOU SHOUT LOUD ENOUGH MAYBE YOU'LL CONVINCE ME. Not.

I've read several of the "ANFO could not have done that" reports, and plenty of posts like yours. I have yet to see anything that adequately explains _why_ the ANFO truckbomb model wouldn't work (or what _should_ have happened when two tons of prime explosives is detonated right at the base of a building). All I get is more "some obscure unnamed expert says it couldn't have happened". Bollocks! ANFO accidents show what happens. Prove otherwise.

115 posted on 04/20/2002 9:53:56 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Justa
What 1993 attack are you talking about, Waco? Boy, if the OKC epic has morphed that way I would take it as an indication the discussion was being sponsored by the American Pharmaceutical Association.

I suggest you get your chronological history straight before you start calling people idiots. First of all, my comment was in response to a question asking if anyone had used ANFO prior to OKC. My response was yes - the WTC in 1993. There was no mention in my post regarding Arab, Middle Eastern, Islamic, or anyone else's involvement in OKC. So I would suggest that you learn to read before you start calling people idiots in gigantic red letters.

Here is the full text of the post I replied to: That they occurred accidentally is largely irrelevant, as they HAPPENED on an OKC scale.

The response I replied to:Wrong. A shipload of amonium nitrate is a far cry from a ryder truckload. As I stated above, name one time a ANFO bomb was contructed to blow up a buiding before OKC.

My respons in full: Didn't they use ANFO and a Ryder van in 1993 to attempt to blow up the WTC? I recall seeing pictures showing that it was parked next to a reinforced wall which reflected the explosion outward. It also removed at least two floors from the parking garage but left the support beams basically intact.

My point was that someone had done that before, but thank God they were unsuccessful. Unfortunately, they would use another tactic eight years later with catastrophic results.

So in case you need more info, here it is:

From Interpol's website:

"On 26th February 1993, at approximately 12.18 p.m., an improvised explosive device exploded on the second level of the World Trade Center parking basement.

"The resulting blast produced a crater, approximately 150 feet in diameter and five floors deep, in the parking basement. The structure consisted mainly of steel-reinforced concrete, twelve to fourteen inches thick. The epicenter of the blast was approximately eight feet from the south wall of Trade Tower Number One, near the support column K31/8. The device had been placed in the rear cargo portion of a one-ton Ford F350 Econoline van, owned by the Ryder Rental Agency, Jersey City, New Jersey. Approximately 6,800 tons of material were displaced by the blast.

"The main explosive charge consisted primarily of approximately 1,200 to 1,500 pounds of a home-made fertilizer-based explosive, urea nitrate. The fusing system consisted of two 20-minute lengths of a non-electric burning type fuse such as green hobby fuse. The hobby fuse terminated in the lead azide, as the initiator.

"Also incorporated in the device and placed under the main explosive charge were three large metal cylinders (tare weight 126 pounds) of compressed hydrogen gas."

Fertilizer bombs were used in both attacks, with the one at the WTC occuring in 1993, two years prior to OKC which occurred in 1995.

Regarding the exact chemical composition of the explosive materials, yes they may be different chemically, but my point still remains, it had been done before. If anything, it reinforces the position that it can be used destructively.

Here is a link containing a picture of the damage done to the WTC in 1993.

116 posted on 04/20/2002 10:35:21 AM PDT by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Next you will read that the conspiracy conspiracists will allege that extra-terrestrials were involved in the OKC bombing......there is no end to the mental meanderings of paranoid types!
117 posted on 04/20/2002 10:43:51 AM PDT by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
As if any support needs to be stirred up for annihilating Iraq. So the "Moonies" *own* the Washington Times. Is there a correlation here that you're pushing? Has the WashTimes been shown to be a propaganda organ for the "Moonies"?

I recognize your intent in mentioning this. It is pathetic.

118 posted on 04/20/2002 11:07:25 AM PDT by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don
Yup...since ANFO has been unilaterally declared incapable of doing that job, we'll hear that it MUST have been several bushels of anti-matter photon grenades.

I just keep shaking my head...what do these people THINK two tons of prime explosives will do to a building?

119 posted on 04/20/2002 11:13:46 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: L_Von_Mises
"Regarding the exact chemical composition of the explosive materials, yes they may be different chemically, but my point still remains, it had been done before. If anything, it reinforces the position that it can be used destructively."

Well, ANFOs been used for decades as a commercial explosive. It's currently used extensively in strip mining operations so it's capabilities as an explosive should not be much of an issue. The 'cutter charge' clan presumes the Murrah building was some sort of a hardened concrete pillbox which required the use of military-grade demolition charges to bring it down. Architecture and gravity are irrelevant to their theories. Hence, the Evil Government Conspiracy.

Besides, the IRAs been using ANFO for decades. If it can blow up an APC it can probably take down a 9-story post-and-beam building.

120 posted on 04/20/2002 1:00:42 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson