Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Back on Saudi Starbucks Logo
Associated Press ^ | 4/19/2002 | AP

Posted on 04/19/2002 7:58:01 AM PDT by B Knotts

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) -- The powerful religious establishment has finally accepted her presence.

The alluring, long-haired woman that Starbucks removed from its logo when it began opening its stores in this conservative kingdom in September 2000 is being restored on plastic and paper cups, bags of coffee and the aprons of the Starbucks staff.

The Saudi religious establishment at first didn't want the Starbucks woman in the logo and regularly sent religious police, called the muttawa, to the stores to ensure they complied. The Seattle-based gourmet coffee retailer had customized its logo, keeping only the woman's crown, in response to advice from the company's local partner.

But on Thursday, the company's president, Peter Maslen, said in a statement to The Associated Press that ``Starbucks original logo will be displayed in both existing and new stores in the country.''

It was not clear when the Starbucks' local partner took the decision to introduce the original logo or why the woman has suddenly become acceptable to the religious establishment.

Starbucks' staff said the muttawa who had ordered the woman removed from their aprons in February returned less than a month later and said it was OK to restore her.

Women in Saudi Arabia have to cover themselves with black cloaks in public and the sexes are strictly segregated.

------

On the Web:

http://www.starbucks.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: coffee; saudi; starbucks; wahhabism; women
Wow. Really making progress, eh? :-P
1 posted on 04/19/2002 7:58:01 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Suadi is not a 'conservative' kingdom. It is a theocratic kingdom and should be called such.
2 posted on 04/19/2002 8:05:40 AM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Alluring?!!! perhaps its a matter of opinion, but judge for yourself.


3 posted on 04/19/2002 8:05:54 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
(For those with bad eyes.)
4 posted on 04/19/2002 8:09:26 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Allowing this public pornography further illustrates the demise of civilzation.
5 posted on 04/19/2002 8:19:52 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts; All
And did you see this one?!

Egypt: McDonald's To Change Name Due To Anti-U.S./Israeli Sentiments

6 posted on 04/19/2002 8:27:11 AM PDT by American Preservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
It was not clear when the Starbucks' local partner took the decision to introduce the original logo or why the woman has suddenly become acceptable to the religious establishment.

I winder if CASH had anything to do with the attitude correction.

7 posted on 04/19/2002 8:28:04 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
If I'm correctly informed, Muslims aren't allowed art that depicts living beings according to the Koran. This drawing would be stretching the point but allowing it would be a reach for a truly backward mullah.
8 posted on 04/19/2002 9:38:55 AM PDT by mushroom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts; Central Scrutiniser
Starbucks To Begin Sinister 'Phase Two' Of Operation
9 posted on 04/19/2002 9:46:32 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mushroom
Though true, the Ottoman civilization and the the mughlai rulers of india were big patrons of the visual arts. Mughlai miniatures are on display in England and India and show that despite current Wahhabi fanatical injunctions against visual art, in the past this interpretation was not widely accepted.
10 posted on 04/19/2002 10:45:48 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson