Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southflanknorthpawsis; Howlin
Hmmm. Perhaps there was an actual reason for an audit, and it had nothing to do with politics.

Audits aren't made public, so donor names wouldn't be disclosed to anyone except the IRS investigator.

As I understand the complaint about the IRS using audits as a political tool, the complaint is that it is a form of harassment. The IRS cannot make up charges. They can question people and ask for records, but if there is nothing wrong the audit is simply annoying.

Now if you have something to hide, that is a different story.

961 posted on 04/24/2002 6:41:43 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
Now if you have something to hide, that is a different story.

Sure is !!!!

964 posted on 04/24/2002 6:44:09 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
Now if you have something to hide, that is a different story.

Do you realize what you just said? It's the standard statist mantra: "What do you have to fear if you've done nothing wrong."

Miss statist Marple, you disappoint me this evening.

999 posted on 04/24/2002 8:37:49 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
Now if you have something to hide, that is a different story.

You ever hear the expression ... it's the principle of the thing?

1,056 posted on 04/24/2002 10:28:31 PM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson