No, he did NOT. As you yourself have pointed out, that is NOT his jurisdiction; you can SAY they are criminal, but until somebody else looks at them and says they are IN A COURT OF LAW, they're not.
There you have it Freepers ... more proof that Howlin isn't quite as conservative as she's led you to believe. She's suggesting that crimes were not committed in Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate, etc.
She suggesting that its not illegal for the Clinton administration to have taken MILLIONS of dollars from foreign entities (like the Red Chinese military) ... something that Klayman helped discover and which we know to be absolute fact because our intelligence sources say its true and few people plead guilty to doing it (like Riady).
She's suggesting that its not illegal for the Whitehouse to have acquired over a thousand (and perhaps thousands according to sworn testimony) of FBI files ONLY on Republicans, nor to have been putting the contents of those files into the WhiteHouse database (which even democRATS admitted to doing), nor to have taken the contents of that databases home and to have loaded them into DNC databases (again, thanks to sworn testimony from multiple people, including some democRATS). Gee ... maybe she should tell the government they made a mistake sending a guy to prison for several years after Watergate because the man illegally acquired ONE FBI file.
She's suggesting that all those lost emails are just an "innocent mistake" and the threats the Clinton staffers made against regular people like you and me to keep them from fixing the problem or telling about it (sworn testimony) were just "misunderstandings".
But we did at least get her to admit that it was never Klayman's responsibility to actually investigate and prosecute those criminal ALLEGATIONS. Now let's see if we can get her to admit that it is Bush and Ashcroft's responsibility!