[FreedominJesusChrist]

Well, you were the one implying that Scaife's personal political affiliation would somehow affect Judicial Watch's non-profit status. It doesn't matter if Scaife is a Republican, what matters is if his Foundation is officially partisan, which it isn't. It wouldn't be a foundation then, would it?

[Howlin]

Well, JW was partisan until the election. He even billed himself as "conservative watchdog." Hard to get around that.

[Amelia]

what matters is if his Foundation is officially partisan, which it isn't. It wouldn't be a foundation then, would it?

I believe that if a non-profit attempts to influence political races or certain legislation, that can be seen as partisan & can cause the non-profit designation to be revoked.

I'm not sure what other rules might apply.

[MoscowMike]

Howdy

Smoke, noise, and clamor over nothing!

Criminetlies! OK folks, here is the Big Truth:

The junkyard dog we see fighting against government corruption and abuse of power that still proceeds from the pervasive and comprehensive corruption of bileh blathe's "leadership" is not a nice doggie.

Nope, mean and nasty.

I for one am well pleased that a mean nasty junkyard dog who you find quaht distahstfuhl is opposing the nazi statist pigs like clinton and boxer and schumer et al.

So if we could clear the meaningless smoke from the air, perhaps we can agree that it is a good thing to have the occasional junkyard dog on hand when we need him, and I agree, as long as he obeys the law of the land. And lest we forget, opposing the brutal abuse of the spirit and letter of the law on the part of the leftist totalitarians who are inches from enslaving you in their new American worker's paradise is THE POINT of the exercise.

It's like getting your panties in a bunch over the color of your life preserver for crying out loud.

I'll be happy to reject and denounce this Klayman dude AFTER he is shown to have broken faith with the public, K?

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

I'm still curious about the story discrepancies involving the CPAC booth. I have it from reliable sources that JW was not denied; rather they did not submit on time.

Could you cite your "facts" and how your version figures in? Please post a copy of the ad to which you referred. It would be most helpful as a point of reference. Do you also know who funded the ad?