[Howlin]

Conservative does not connote a political affiliation, which would be a violation of one's tax exempt status as a non-profit.

I'm pretty sure taking money from Richard Scaiffe would qualify.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Howlin,

Scaife's Foundation is not partisan. Even if Scaife is a registered Republican, that wouldn't affect Judicial Watch's tax exempt status at all. I am a registered Republican in my state too, but that doesn't affect any of the non-profits that I give to.

[deport]

Scaife...... The Scaife Foundations gave $800,000 to the 'ethical Washington Watchdog' in 1998.....

[BeAChooser]

I'm pretty sure taking money from Richard Scaiffe would qualify.

You are really exposing yourself for what you are on this thread, Howlin. Thanks.

Of course he may have taken money from Scaiffe. There is no law against that. Bill Clinton could have given him money without there being any violation of laws. The fact that he has now gone after both the Clinton and Bush administrations would seem to prove that he is non-partisan. Now if he took money from Scaiffe and didn't go after Bush, THEN you might have an argument. Or if he took money from Clinton during the Clinton years (as some of you move-on'ers have suggested in these Klayman fests) and ignored Clinton crimes, THEN you might have a point. But neither situation is the case.

It is interesting to hear you recite the arguments used by the democRATS when Klayman was going after Clinton. Wonder where you heard them?