Yeah, right, you have a bone to pick with the fellow who runs Judicial Watch because he had a squabble with his mommy and that makes him a thief who can not be trusted with donations.
Can you spare a word of criticism for an authentic latter day nazi in the person of bill clinton?
I mean, your claim that this Judicial Watch guy does not deserve to be trusted rests on no substance at all.
There is no lack of substance in the experience of the thousands who were orphaned by clintons asinine, twisted, unenleightened, evilly inspired non leadership.
So exercise your freedom to denounce anyone you want, and I will exercise my freedom to spotlight your hilariously unjustifiable focus.
If this Klayman fellow has abused funds, a charge devoid of sustance IMHO, some of us might be out two or three bucks.
The history books will have to devote chapters to the human suffering and death visited upon us by the loathesome leftist criminal from Arkansas .
Pick your fight, even if is the choice of a profoundly silly mind.
I mean, your claim that this Judicial Watch guy does not deserve to be trusted rests on no substance at all.
Perhaps YOU can explain to us all then why it is that Klayman spent less than $2,000,000 on LEGAL FEES, ETC., and blew the other $23,000,000 he collected last year?